STUDENT PREFERENCES VS ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN ONLINE AND FACE TO FACE LEARNING IN BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES: PERCEPTION VS REALITY

Main Article Content

Irum Rehman
Ayesha Naveed
Farheen Masood
Shaista Ali
Amna Bilal
Muhammad Imran Bajwa

Keywords

Online learning, Face-to-face teaching, Student perception, Academic performance, Dental education

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid transition from traditional classroom teaching to online learning, profoundly impacting medical and dental education. This shift raised concerns regarding its effectiveness compared to conventional face-to-face modalities.


Objective: To compare student perceptions of online versus face-to-face teaching and to evaluate their academic performance under both modalities.


Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 preclinical BDS students. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire assessing preferences, satisfaction, and challenges related to online learning. Academic performance was compared using results from two consecutive terms: the first taught online during the pandemic and the second delivered on campus. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23, with Chi-square tests applied; a p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.


Results: A significant association was observed between academic performance and teaching modality (p = 0.012). The pass rate was higher among students taught face-to-face (9.2%) compared to those taught online (3.4%). Questionnaire responses revealed that most students preferred traditional on-campus classes, citing teacher presence, structured interaction, and reduced distractions as key benefits. Online classes were perceived as less personalized and more challenging in terms of engagement.


Conclusion: Face-to-face teaching was found to be more effective in terms of both student performance and satisfaction. While online learning offers flexibility, its limitations necessitate careful integration. A blended approach may provide the most balanced and sustainable model for future dental education.

Abstract 23 | PDF Downloads 5

References

1. Gismalla MDA, Mohamed MS, Ibrahim OSO, Elhassan MMA, Mohamed MNE. Medical students’ perception towards E-learning during COVID 19 pandemic in a high burden developing country. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21.
2. Mali D, Lim H. How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? International Journal of Management Education. 2021;19.
3. Ali MW, Khattak AF. Undergraduate students’ perception and satisfaction regarding online learning system amidst COVID-19 Pandemic in Pakistan [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350354569
4. Gravani MN. Adult learning principles in designing learning activities for teacher development. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2012;31:419–32.
5. Lei M, Medwell J. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student teachers: how the shift to online collaborative learning affects student teachers’ learning and future teaching in a Chinese context. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2021;22:169–79.
6. Upadhayaya PR, Gnawali YP, Belbase S. FACTORS INFLUENCING GRADUATE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF ONLINE AND DISTANCE LEARNING IN NEPAL [Internet]. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2021. Available from: https://learning. cehrd.edu.np/
7. Keppetipola N, Patchen T. Titrating Teaching: An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Online and Face-to-Face Undergraduate Biochemistry Instruction † . J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021;22.
8. Tuah NAA, Naing L. Is Online Assessment in Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 Pandemic Reliable? Siriraj Med J. 2021;73:61–8.
9. Setyawan A, Nur S, 1 A, Surtikanti MW, Quinones CA. Students’ Perception of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study on the English Students of STKIP Pamane Talino Article Info. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2020;10.
10. Bączek M, Zagańczyk-Bączek M, Szpringer M, Jaroszyński A, Wożakowska-Kapłon B. Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine. 2021;100:e24821.
11. Vala NH, Vachhani M v, Sorani AM. Study of evaluation of e-learning classes among medical students during COVID-19 pandemic phase in Jamnagar city. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol [Internet]. 1040 [cited 2021 Oct 6];10:12. Available from: www.njppp.com
12. Albalushi H, al Mushaiqri M, Sirasanagandla SR, Das S. Students’ Performance in Face-to-Face, Online, and Hybrid Methods of Teaching and Assessment in Anatomy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19.
13. Memon I, Feroz Z, Alkushi A, Qamar N, Ismail F. Switching from face-to-face to an online teaching strategy: how anatomy and physiology teaching transformed post-COVID-19 for a university preprofessional program. Adv Physiol Educ. 2021;45:481–5.
14. Kositanurit W, Vivatvakin S, Kaikaew K, Varachotisate P, Burana C, Chayanupatkul M, et al. Asynchronous online lecture may not be an effective method in teaching cardiovascular physiology during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22.
15. D’Arcy CE, Lapsov L, Navarro V, Nevarez D, Olimpo JT. Converting a face-to-face neuroanatomy course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) to an online environment: lessons learned from remote teaching. Adv Physiol Educ. 2023;47:52–70.
16. Safura S. Students’ Perception of Online Learning During Covid-19: An Evidence from University of Muhammadiyah Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal on Research in STEM Education. 2021;3:01–6.
17. Halpin PA. Redesigning a face-to-face course to an asynchronous online format: a look at teaching pathophysiology with software that enhances student engagement. Adv Physiol Educ. 2022;46:339–44.
18. Bernard C, Lectureship D, Silverthorn DU. Teaching and learning in the interactive classroom. Adv Physiol Educ [Internet]. 2006;30:135–40. Available from: www.vanth.org
19. Nikolopoulou K. Face-To-Face, Online and Hybrid Education: University Students’ Opinions and Preferences. Journal of Digital Educational Technology. 2022;2:ep2206.