IMPACT OF AN INTERVENTIONAL PACKAGE ON QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG ELDERLY PEOPLE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Elderly care, Quality of life, Interventional package, WHOQOL-BREF, Aging
Abstract
The global rise in the elderly population has placed increased emphasis on improving not only longevity but also quality of life (QoL). In India, where elderly individuals often face challenges of chronic illness, social isolation, and reduced autonomy, holistic interventions targeting multiple aspects of well-being are needed. This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 300 elderly participants aged 60–70 years, with 150 drawn from elderly homes and 150 from family residences in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
The intervention consisted of an 8-week program including yoga, laughter therapy, group discussions, and guided spiritual practices designed to improve physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being. Participants were selected using simple random sampling and assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF (Gujarati version) before and after the intervention. Data analysis was performed using SPSS v26, with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test applied for within-group differences, Mann-Whitney U Test for between-group comparisons, and Chi-square test for associations with demographics.
Findings showed significant improvements in QoL scores across both groups (p < 0.001). Elderly home participants demonstrated a mean improvement of 52.10 points, while family residents improved by 36.45 points. Although baseline scores were higher among family residents, elderly home participants exhibited greater relative gains. Demographic variables such as age, gender, marital status, and education did not significantly influence outcomes.
This study confirms that a multidimensional interventional package can significantly enhance QoL among elderly individuals. Larger sample findings reinforce earlier pilot results, demonstrating the scalability of such interventions. Incorporating these programs into routine care in both institutional and community settings could provide a sustainable approach to active and meaningful aging.
References
2. Atchley, R. C. (1989). Continuity theory of aging. The Gerontologist, 29(2), 183–190.
3. Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135(5), 129–136.
4. Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 15–24.
5. Havighurst, R. J. (1963). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 3(1), 8–13.
6. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237.
7. International Diabetes Federation. (2021). IDF Diabetes Atlas (10th ed.).
8. Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 1–33.
9. Kumar, S., Singh, A., & Desai, R. (2020). Quality of life interventions for older adults in India. Journal of Geriatric Society of India, 12(3), 145–151.
10. Lawton, M. P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. The Gerontologist, 22(4), 349–357.
11. Martin, R. A. (2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 504–519.
12. National Institute on Aging. (2011). Global health and aging. NIH.
13. Nilsson, M. (1989). Gerotranscendence: A theory about maturing into old age. Journal of Aging Studies, 3(2), 67–81.
14. Patel, V., & Prince, M. (2018). Global mental health of the elderly. The Lancet, 392(10147), 1253–1254.
15. Sharma, R. (2019). Geriatric care in India: Challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Public Health, 63(3), 179–183.
16. Singh, S., & Misra, R. (2020). Yoga as a holistic approach for elderly health: Evidence and implications. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 26(9), 789–795.
17. United Nations. (2022). World population prospects 2022. UN DESA.
18. WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.
19. Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273(1), 59–65.
20. World Health Organization. (2020). Global report on ageism. WHO.
21. World Health Organization. (2019). Integrated care for older people (ICOPE): Guidance for person-centered assessment and pathways. WHO.
 
							