FOLFOX AND FOLFIRI CHEMOTHERAPY IN A METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENT: A CASE REPORT OF DUAL REGIMEN INTOLERANCE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Colorectal cancer, Chemotherapy, FOLFOX rechallenge, FOLFIRI toxicity, Capecitabine, Irinotecan, Palliative Care
Abstract
Background: FOLFOX and FOLFIRI are standard chemotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). While both regimens are associated with distinct toxicity profiles, intolerance to both is uncommon and poses a major therapeutic challenge.
Case Presentation: The case of a 54-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid region (stage IV B), confirmed to be microsatellite stable (MSS) on immunohistochemistry. The patient initially received 12 cycles of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab, achieving a partial metabolic response. Maintenance capecitabine was initiated but discontinued due to gastrointestinal intolerance. A subsequent whole-body PET-CT showed progressive disease. The patient was started on FOLFIRI with bevacizumab but developed severe grade 4 lower gastrointestinal toxicity and acute cholinergic syndrome, necessitating hospitalization and FOLFIRI regimen discontinuation. A rechallenge with the FOLFOX regimen was attempted; however, the patient again experienced significant intolerance. In view of prior fluoropyrimidine response, low-dose capecitabine was re-initiated with supportive care and close monitoring.
Conclusion: This case highlights the complexity of managing mCRC in patients who exhibit intolerance to both FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens. Early recognition of severe toxicity, careful dose modification, and personalized therapeutic planning are essential.
Keywords:
References
2. Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):2013–9.
3. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(4):359–69.
4. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9209):1041–7.
5. Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, et al. Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with availability of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(8):1209–14.
6. Mathijssen RHJ, et al. (2001). Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11).Clinical Cancer Research, 7(8), 2182-2194.
7. He W, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicities of chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(14):3751–3759.
8. Aparicio T, et al. Risk factors for severe chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2007;109(12):2381–2389.
9. Innocenti F, Undevia SD, Iyer L, et al. Genetic variants in the UGT1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia with irinotecan. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(22):1382–8.
10. Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1909–19.
11. Grothey A, Sobrero AF, Siena S, et al. Time to tumor progression as a surrogate endpoint in mCRC: regorafenib phase III analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):33–42.
12. Van Cutsem E, Lenz HJ, Köhne CH, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab and RAS mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(7):692–700.