GROSS AND HISTOLOGICAL STUDY OF HUMAN LIVER MORPHOLOGY INCLUDING SINUSOIDAL ARCHITECTURE AND ITS SURGICAL IMPLICATIONS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Liver morphology, sinusoidal architecture, anatomical variation, cadaveric study.
Abstract
Background: Did we mention that liver, which is the largest gland in the human body, displays wide variation in gross morphology and sinusoidal microarchitecture? Such variations may manifest as pathologies on imaging or may add added difficulty to hepatobiliary procedures. Such studies must encompass both morphology and histology for relevant clinical insight.
Materials and Methods: Among 36 formalin-preserved livers selected for descriptive cadaveric study at the Department of Anatomy, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences, February 2024 to July 2025. The gross features, which included lobes, fissures, grooves, impressions, and accessory lobes, were observed and classified according to Netter. Histological sections were stained with H&E, reticulin, and Masson’s trichrome for the assessment of lobular organization, portal triads, and sinusoidal arrangement.
Results: Out of 36 specimens, 19 (52.78%) had normal morphology, whereas 17 (47.22%) were considered to have a variation. The abnormalities observed included accessory fissures (22.22%), pons hepatis (11.11%), quadrate lobe anomalies (11.11%), accessory lobes (2.78%), and diaphragmatic grooves (11.11%). Riedel's lobe and saddle-shaped left lobes were also seen. Histology revealed a consistent classical lobular structure with hepatocyte cords radiating from central veins, fenestrated sinusoidal endothelium, and well-defined portal triads.
Conclusion: Almost 50% of livers exhibited possible morphological variants that could simulate disease or complicate surgical intervention. Thus, awareness of such variants along with sinusoidal architecture is indispensable for the interpretation of imaging and safe practice.
References
2. Kalra A, Yetiskul E, Wehrle CJ, et al. Physiology, Liver. [Updated 2023 May 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535438/
3. Chaudhari HJ, Ravat MK, Vaniya VH, Bhedi AN. Morphological study of human liver and its surgical importance. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):AC09-12.
4. Sangeetha A, Kumar SN. Morphological variations of the liver and its applied significance: a cadaveric study. J Datta Meghe Inst Med Sci Univ. 2021;16(3):303-7.
5. Rutkauskas S, Gedrimas V, Pundzius J, Barauskas G, Basevicius A. Clinical and anatomical basis for the classification of the structural parts of liver. Medicina (Kaunas). 2006;42(2):98-106.
6. Joshi MM, Chavan SK. Morphological study of adult human cadaveric liver. Int J Anat Res. 2017;2(6):4284-9.
7. Wang Q, Liu J, Yin W, Wang A, Zheng J, Wang Y, et al. Microscale tissue engineering of liver lobule models: advancements and applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1303053. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1303053.
8. Gibert-Ramos A, Sanfeliu-Redondo D, Aristu-Zabalza P, Martínez-Alcocer A, Gracia-Sancho J, Guixé-Muntet S, et al. The hepatic sinusoid in chronic liver disease: the optimal milieu for cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(22):5719. doi:10.3390/cancers13225719.
9. Netter F. Atlas of Human Anatomy. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2000.
10. Sunitha V, Neelee J. A new insight into the morphology of the human liver: a cadaveric study. ISRN Anat. 2013;2013:689564. doi:10.5402/2013/689564.
11. Auh YH, Lim JH, Kim KW, Lee DH, Lee MG, Cho KS. Loculated fluid collections in hepatic fissures and recesses: CT appearance and potential pitfalls. Radiographics. 1994;14(3):529-40.
12. Macchi V, Feltrin G, Parenti A, De Caro R. Diaphragmatic sulci and portal fissures. J Anat. 2003;202(3):303-8.
13. Patil S, Sethi M, Kakar S. Morphological study of human liver and its surgical importance. Int J Anat Res. 2014;2(2):310-4.
14. Saritha S, Ramani R, Nagajyothi Y, Yesender. Cadaveric study of morphological variations in the human liver and its clinical importance. Int J Med Sci Clin Inventions. 2015;6(7):1020-31.
15. Aktan ZA, Savas R, Pinar Y, Arslan O. Lobes and segment anomalies of the liver. J Anat Soc India. 2001;50(1):15-6.
16. Ebby S, Ambike MV. Anatomical variation of ligamentum teres of liver – a case report. Webmed Cent Anat. 2012;3(5):WMC003389.
17. Demirci A, Diren HB. Computed tomography in agenesis of the right lobe of the liver. Acta Radiol. 1990;31(2):105-13.
18. Ross MH, Pawlina W. Histology: A text and atlas with correlated cell and molecular biology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
19. Martinez-Hernandez A, Martinez J. The role of capillarization in hepatic failure: studies in carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1991;14(5):864-74. doi:10.1002/hep.1840140514.
20. Simionescu N, Simionescu M. The cardiovascular system. In: Weiss L, editor. Cell and tissue biology. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1988. p. 355-98.
21. Wisse E, Braet F, Luo D, De Zanger R, Jans D, Crabbe E, et al. Structure and function of sinusoidal lining cells in the liver. Toxicol Pathol. 1996;24(1):100-11. doi:10.1177/019262339602400114.
22. Bhunchet E, Fujieda K. Capillarization and venularization of hepatic sinusoids in porcine serum-induced rat liver fibrosis: a mechanism to maintain liver blood flow. Hepatology. 1993;18(6):1450-8. doi:10.1002/hep.1840180626.
23. Lamers WH, Hilberts A, Furt E, Smith J, Moorman AF. Human sinusoidal drainage occurs exclusively into central veins. Anat Rec. 1999;254(3):1-7.
24. Muktyaz H, Nema U, Suniti RM, Mahboobul H. Anatomical study of accessory sulci of liver and its clinical significance in North Indian population. Int J Med Health Sci. 2013;2(3):224-9.