APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY FOR FABRICATING THE OBTURATOR IN REHABILATATION OF MAXILLARY DEFECT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Main Article Content
Keywords
Digital Dentistry, Oral Rehabilitation, 3D Imaging, Facial Prosthesis, CAD-CAM Technology
Abstract
Statement of problem - The purpose of this systemic review is to assess the outcomes of applications of digital technology for the fabrication of obturators in patients with maxillectomy defects. Digital techniques have been applied in dentistry to simplify oral rehabilitation procedures. The acquisition of 3 dimensional (3D) images of oral structures has made it possible to virtually define treatment planning, to design and mill restorations, and to monitor the result of surgical and restorative procedures.
Material and methods- This study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol had been registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) with the registration number The PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study) criteria employed in the systematic review included. The focused question was “Applying digital technology and assessing the accuracy of obturators fabricated using digital techniques.” Inclusion criteria for this review was studies evaluating the rehabilitation of acquired maxillary defect using digital scanning methods.
Conclusion- The main outcome of the review was that the application of digital workflows in the fabrication of obturators was found to reduce working time, minimize material consumption, and enhance patient comfort and acceptance.
References
Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral
tissues: A systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2019 Feb
1;121(2):246-51.
2. Jablonski RY, Coward TJ, Bartlett P, Keeling AJ, Bojke C, Pavitt SH, Nattress BR.
IMproving facial PRosthesis construction with contactlESs Scanning and Digital
workflow (IMPRESSeD): Study protocol for a feasibility crossover randomised
controlled trial of digital versus conventional manufacture of facial prostheses in
patients with orbital or nasal facial defects. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2023 Jul
3;9(1):110.
3. Amornvit P, Sanohkan S. The accuracy of digital face scans obtained from 3D
scanners: an in vitro study. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health. 2019 Dec;16(24):5061.
4. Paul A, Dhawan P, Jain N. Digital Applications in the Fabrication of Obturators in
Maxillectomy Defects: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Sep 30;16(9).
5. NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools. (2021). Accessed: September 29, 2024:
https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.
6. Park JH, Lee KS, Lee JY, Shin SW: Fabricating a maxillary obturator using an
intraoral digital impression: a case history report. Int J Prosthodont. 2017, 30:266-8.
10.11607/ijp.5213
7. Michelinakis G, Pavlakis M, Igoumenakis D: Rehabilitation of a maxillectomy patient
using intraoral scanning impression technology and a computer-aided
design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated obturator prosthesis: a clinical
report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018, 18:282-7. 10.4103/jips.jips_14_18
8. Tasopoulos T, Chatziemmanouil D, Karaiskou G, Kouveliotis G, Wang J, Zoidis P:
Fabrication of a 3D-printed interim obturator prosthesis: a contemporary approach. J
Prosthet Dent. 2019, 121:960-3. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.004
9. Tasopoulos T, Chatziemmanouil D, Kouveliotis G, Karaiskou G, Wang J, Zoidis P:
PEEK maxillary obturatorprosthesis fabrication using intraoral scanning, 3D printing,
and CAD/CAM. Int J Prosthodont. 2020, 33:333-40. 10.11607/ijp.6575
10. Ye H, Wang Z, Sun Y, Zhou Y: Fully digital workflow for the design and
manufacture of prostheses for maxillectomy defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2021, 126:257-
61. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.026
11. Ding L, Chen X, Zhang J, Wang R, Wu G: Digital fabrication of a maxillary obturator
prosthesis by using a 3-dimensionally-printed polyetheretherketone framework. |
Prosthet Dent. 2023, 129:230-3. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.002