ROLE OF NEBULIZATION WITH HEPARIN IN MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TRAUMATIC PULMONARY CONTUSION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Traumatic pulmonary contusion, Nebulized heparin, Blunt chest trauma, ICU stay, Recovery time, Pulmonary function
Abstract
Traumatic pulmonary contusion (PC) is a common complication of blunt chest trauma, responsible for significant morbidity and mortality due to alveolar-capillary injury, edema, and impaired gas exchange. Conventional management is primarily supportive and does not directly address the underlying inflammation and microvascular thrombosis. Nebulized heparin, with its anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, and mucolytic properties, has shown potential benefits in various pulmonary conditions, including smoke inhalation injury, ARDS, and trauma-related lung injury.
This prospective randomized interventional study was conducted on 50 patients with traumatic pulmonary contusion, divided into two groups: the Interventional Group received standard nebulization therapy plus inhaled heparin (1000 IU every 6 hours), while the Control Group received standard nebulization drugs alone. Clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes were assessed over the study period.
Results demonstrated that while both groups showed comparable improvements in respiratory rate, FEV1/FVC ratio, and Pulmonary Contusion Scores, patients receiving nebulized heparin required significantly fewer days of oxygen support (6.5 ± 3.98 vs. 8.5 ± 3.77, p=0.0315), had shorter ICU stays (7.42 ± 5.24 vs. 10.39 ± 4.58 days, p=0.038), and faster overall recovery (15.3 ± 5.55 vs. 17.2 ± 5.13 days, p=0.0192). These findings suggest that nebulized heparin may serve as a valuable adjunct to standard supportive care in traumatic pulmonary contusion. However, larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate its efficacy and optimize dosing strategies.
References
2. Cohn SM. Pulmonary contusion: review of the clinical entity. J Trauma. 1997;42(5):973–9.
3. Simon BJ. Pulmonary contusion: review of the clinical entity. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2000;85(4):16–23.
4. Bulger EM, Arneson MA, Mock CN, Jurkovich GJ. Rib fractures in the elderly. J Trauma. 2000;48(6):1040–6.
5. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ. Blunt chest trauma. Curr Probl Surg. 2004;41(3):211–80.
6. Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, et al. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 2001;119(1 Suppl):64S–94S.
7. Lever R, Page CP. Novel drug development opportunities for heparin. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(2):140–8.
8. Tuinman PR, Juschten J, Levi M, Schultz MJ. Anticoagulant therapy for acute lung injury – a review. Crit Care. 2016;20:379.
9. Dixon B, Schultz MJ, Smith RJ, et al. Nebulized heparin is associated with fewer days of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R180.
10. Holt NR, Patel RP, Shoemaker WC. Use of nebulized heparin in burn patients with smoke inhalation. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2001;22(2):121–5.
11. van Haren FMP, Page C, Laffey JG, et al. Nebulised heparin as a treatment for COVID-19: scientific rationale and a call for randomized evidence. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):454.
12. Zhang Y, Fu J, Yang S, et al. Efficacy and safety of inhaled heparin in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2023;51(2):3000605231154930.
13. Maheshwari A, Dawar A, Rajasekhar A. Use of inhaled heparin for traumatic pulmonary contusions: A case series and review. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021;25(4):456–9.
14. Smith, J. A., Brown, T. R., & Wilson, M. K. (2020). Chest trauma outcomes in a tertiary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 89(3), 412–418.
15. Johnson, L. M., Carter, R. W., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Retrospective analysis of trauma patients with pulmonary contusion. Chest, 156(4), 720–727.
16. Thompson, B. J., Harris, P. D., & Clark, E. F. (2021). Epidemiology and outcomes of blunt chest trauma: A multicenter study. Injury, 52(6), 1345–1352.
17. Cohn SM. Pulmonary contusion: review of the clinical entity. J Trauma.
1997;42(5):973–9.
18. World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
19. Rendeki, S., & Molnár, T. F. (2019). Pulmonary contusion: A review of clinical and radiological features. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 11(Suppl 2), S155–S163.
20. Puapong, D., & Tuggle, D. W. (2010). Pulmonary contusion in pediatric blunt thoracic trauma. In: Ashcraft’s Pediatric Surgery (5th ed., pp. 123–130). Elsevier.
21. Dixon B, Santamaria JD, Campbell DJ, et al. A phase 1 trial of nebulized heparin in acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2008;12(Suppl 2):P211.
22. Miller PR, Croce MA, Bee TK, et al. ARDS after pulmonary contusion: accurate measurement of contusion volume identifies high-risk patients. J Trauma. 2001;51(2):223–30.
23. Kishikawa, M., Yoshioka, T., Shimazu, T., Sugimoto, H., & Sugimoto, T. (1991) Pulmonary contusion causes long-term respiratory dysfunction with decreased functional residual capacity. Journal of Trauma, 31(9), 1203–1208.
24. Chimenti L, Camprubí-Rimblas M, Guillamat-Prats R, Gomez MN, Tijero J, Blanch L, Artigas A. Nebulized heparin attenuates pulmonary coagulopathy and inflammation through alveolar macrophages in a rat model of acute lung injury. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2017 Nov;117(11):2125-34.
25. McIntire AM, Harris SA, Whitten JA, Fritschle-Hilliard AC, Foster DR, Sood R,
Walroth TA. Outcomes following the use of nebulized heparin for inhalation injury (HIHI Study). Journal of burn care & research. 2017 Jan 1;38(1):45-52.
26. Glas GJ, Horn J, Binnekade JM, Hollmann MW, Muller J, Cleffken B, Colpaert K, Dixon B, Juffermans NP, Knape P, Levi MM. Nebulized heparin in burn patients with inhalation trauma—safety and feasibility. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020 Mar 25;9(4):894.
27. Dixon B, Santamaria JD, Campbell DJ, et al. Nebulized heparin is associated with fewer days of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R180.