ROLE OF IMAGING MODALITIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS.
Main Article Content
Keywords
Acute pancreatitis, Ultrasonography, CT scan, Diagnosis
Abstract
Introduction: Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory disorder of the pancreas that can range from mild, self-limiting symptoms to severe, life-threatening illness with multiorgan failure. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential, with imaging playing a critical role.
Material and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over two years in the Department of Radiodiagnosis in collaboration with the Department of Surgery, NC Medical College and Hospital, Israna, Panipat. Patients of either gender, aged 20–70 years, admitted with acute pancreatitis were included. Ultrasonography (USG) was performed using Voluson P8 with curvilinear, linear, and Doppler probes. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) was carried out using a GE 32-slice CT scanner, and MRI was performed on a 1.5 Tesla Siemens system.
Results: USG detected pancreatic enlargement, altered echotexture, and peripancreatic fluid collections, with a sensitivity of 87% for diagnosing acute pancreatitis. CT demonstrated 100% sensitivity in visualization and size assessment of the pancreas, and was superior in detecting complications that were missed on USG. While USG proved to be a rapid, non-invasive, safe, and cost-effective initial screening tool, CT provided more detailed diagnostic information and better delineation of disease extent.
Conclusion: CT scan remains the gold standard for diagnosing and staging acute pancreatitis. However, USG is a valuable first-line modality in emergency and critical care settings, serving as an initial screening technique that can be supplemented by CT for confirmation and evaluation of complications.
References
2. Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK, O’Connell PR. The pancreas. In: Bailey and Love’s Short practice of Surgery. 25th ed. Hodder Arnold London;2008:p1130-53.
3. Singh H, Singh I, Yadav M. Gastrointestinal secretions. In: Textbook of Physiology for Medical Students. 2nd ed. New Delhi. Elsevier;2023:p278.
4. Lalith S, Illagovan G. Comparative study of ultrasonography and computed tomography in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Surgery and Radiology.2019; 4(3):28-33.
5. M Uma Maheswara Rao, Sree Lalitha S.P.J, Saai Raghuvendra. “Ultrasonography v/s Computed tomography in the evaluation of Pancreatitis: A Preliminary study”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2015;4(35):6099-110.
6. Silverstein W, Isikoff MB, Hill MC, Barkin J. Diagnostic imaging of acute pancreatitis prospective study using CT and sonography.AJR.1981;137(3):497-502.
7. Calleja GA, Barkin JS. Acute pancreatitis. Medical Clin North Am,1993;77(5):1037-55.
8. Buchler MW, Gloor B, Muller CA et al. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis:treatment strategy according to the status of infection.Ann Surg.2000;232:619-26.
9. Shah PS, Shah SC et al. Aetiology and pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis, chapter 2 Management of acute pancreatitis, by Bhansali SK and Shah SC, Jaslok hospital. 2006:2-6.
10. Jeffrey Jr RB, “Sonography in acute pancreatitis” Radio Clin N Am.1989;27(1):5-17
11. Jeffrey Jr RB, Federle MP, Crass RA.”Computed tomography of pancreatic trauma” radiology.1993;147:491-4
12. Sheedy PF, Stephen DH, Hattery RR, MacCarty RL, Williamson Jr B- Computed Tomography of the Pancreas. Radiol Clin Am.1977;15(3):349-66
13. Freeny PC-Radiology of the Pancreas;Two decades of Progress in imaging and intervention.AJR,1988;150:975-81
14. Hessel SJ et al. A prospective evaluation of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound of the Pancreas.Radiology.1982;143:129-33
15. Garber As, William R Lees.Pancreatic inflammatory disease:In Abdominal and General Ultrasound.Cosgrove DH.
16. Meire, K Dewbury Ed.Edinburgh:Churchill Livingstone.1993;1023:143-56.
17. Balthazar EJ.Complication of acute pancreatitis clinical and CT evaluation.Radiol Clin Am.2002;40(5):1211-27.