UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS FOR NEUROSURGICAL INTERVENTIONS: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Shared decision-making, neurosurgical interventions, patient-centered care
Abstract
Background: High-risk operations that have a major effect on patients' quality of life are frequently a part of neurosurgical interventions. Given the intricacy of these choices, it is essential to comprehend the viewpoints of patients, families, and healthcare professionals, especially when it comes to shared decision-making (SDM).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate, through a qualitative method, how neurosurgical care decisions are made, with an emphasis on the emotional, cultural, and cognitive aspects that affect treatment decisions.
Methods: 110 participants, including patients, family members, and medical professionals, participated in a qualitative study at a tertiary care neurosurgery center. Key themes impacting decision-making were identified using thematic content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews.
Results: Although 56.7% of patients favored SDM, power was frequently transferred to surgeons or families due to cultural dominance, emotional suffering, and a lack of medical understanding. Effective SDM was hampered by patient impairment, time constraints, and a lack of teaching resources, according to healthcare providers.
Conclusion: Making decisions on neurosurgery is a complicated process that is influenced by economic, cultural, emotional, and medical aspects. Patient care and family involvement can be improved by using shared decision-making (SDM) in a more methodical and compassionate way. To improve collaborative decision-making, future initiatives should concentrate on educating healthcare professionals and putting decision-support systems into place.
References
2. 12. Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, Lindseth A, Norberg A, Brink E, Carlsson J, Dahlin-Ivanof S, Johansson IL, Kjellgren K, Lidén E, Öhlén J, Olsson LE, Rosén H, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS (2011) Person-centered care–ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 10:248–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008
3. Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA (2013) Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 70:351–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558712 465774
4. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making–pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366:780–781. https:// doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283
5. Childress JF, Childress MD (2020) What does the evolution from informed consent to shared decision making teach us about authority in health care? AMA J Ethics 22:E423-429. https:// doi. org/10.1001/amajethics.2020.423
6. Makoul G, Clayman ML (2006) An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 60:301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010
7. Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC (2015) Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns 98:1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022
8. Gaston CM, Mitchell G (2005) Information giving and decision making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 61:2252–2264. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. socsc imed. 2005. 04.015
9. Muller-Engelmann M, Keller H, Donner-Banzhoff N, Krones T (2011) Shared decision making in medicine: the influence of situational treatment factors. Patient Educ Couns 82:240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.028
10. Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW (2016) The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. JAMA 315:2063–2064. https:// doi. org/ 10.1001/jama.2016.3070
11. Corell A, Thurin E, Skoglund T, Farahmand D, Henriksson R, Rydenhag B, Gulati S, Bartek J Jr, Jakola AS (2019) Neurosurgical treatment and outcome patterns of meningioma in Sweden: a nationwide registry-based study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 161:333 341. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00701-019-03799-3
12. Rolston JD, Han SJ, Lau CY, Berger MS, Parsa AT (2014) Frequency and predictors of complications in neurological surgery: national trends from 2006 to 2011. J Neurosurg 120:736–745. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.10.Jns122419
13. Näslund O, Skoglund T, Farahmand D, Bontell TO, Jakola AS (2020) Indications and outcome in surgically treated asymptomatic meningiomas: a single-center case-control study. Acta Neurochir 162:2155–2163. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00701-020-04244-6
14. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, Patil N, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2019) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016. Neuro Oncol 21:v1–v100. https:// doi.org/10.1093/neuron/ noz150
15. Solheim O, Jakola AS, Gulati S, Johannesen TB (2012) Incidence and causes of perioperative mortality after primary surgery for intracranial tumors: a national, population-based study. J Neuro surg 116:825–834. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.12.JNS11339
16. Solheim O, Torsteinsen M, Johannesen TB, Jakola AS (2014) Effects of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging in outpatients on observed incidence of intracranial tumors and patient survival: a national observational study. J Neurosurg 120:827–832. https:// doi.org/10.3171 /2013.12.jns131312
17. Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Mak oul G (2012) Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 86:9–18. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. pec.2011.02.004
18. Harrison JD, Seymann G, Imershein S, Amin A, Afsarmanesh N, Uppington J, Aledia A, Pretanvil S, Wilson B, Wong J, Varma J, Boggan J, Hsu FPK, Carter B, Martin N, Berger M, Lau CY (2019) The impact of unmet communication and education needs on neurosurgical patient and caregiver experiences of care: a qual itative exploratory analysis. World Neurosurg 122:e1528–e1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.094
19. Härter M, Buchholz A, Nicolai J, Reuter K, Komarahadi F, Kris ton L, Kallinowski B, Eich W, Bieber C (2015) Shared decision making and the use of decision aids. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112:672 679. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0672
20. Hewins W, Zienius K, Rogers JL, Kerrigan S, Bernstein M, Grant R (2019) The effects of brain tumours upon medical decision-making capacity. Curr Oncol Rep 21:55. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11912-019-0793-3
21. Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Krieger, H. (2015). Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Medical Decision Making, 35(4), 539-557.
22. O’Neill, S. C., et al. (2019). Understanding patient perspectives on neurosurgery decision-making: A qualitative interview study. BMJ Open, 9(6), e026772.
23. Scheibler, F., et al. (2020). Patient-centered communication in neurosurgery: needs and challenges. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 24.
24. Raichle KA, Hanley M, Jensen MP, Cardenas DD. Cognitions, coping, and social environment predict adjustment to pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain 2001;8(9):718–29. [PubMed: 17611163]
25. Fieggen, A. G., et al. (2014). Decision-making in pediatric neurosurgery: cultural and social considerations. Child's Nervous System, 30(3), 399–406.
26. Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., Cording, Emma (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27, 1361 1367. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
27. C. Charles et al. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or, it takes at least two to tango Social Science & Medicine (1997).