IMPACT OF ANATOMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIATIONS IN THE CYSTIC ARTERY AND SURGICAL RISK IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY"
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for gallbladder diseases. Despite being minimally invasive, LC carries a risk of complications, primarily due to anatomical and physiological variations in the hepatobiliary system, especially the cystic artery. An understanding of these variations is crucial to reduce intraoperative bleeding, bile duct injury, and conversion to open surgery.
Objective: To assess the prevalence and types of anatomical and physiological variations in the cystic artery and their impact on surgical risk during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of 12 months from January to December 2024 at a tertiary care teaching Hospital Lahore. A total of 150 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. Intraoperative findings regarding the anatomy of the cystic artery such as origin, course, number, and relation to the cystic duct were documented. Data on intraoperative complications, conversion rates, and operative time were also recorded. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used for analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Anatomical variations of the cystic artery were observed in 38% of cases. The most common variation was a double cystic artery (16%), followed by low-lying artery (12%), and artery arising from the right hepatic artery with a tortuous course (10%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 22% of cases with variant anatomy, compared to 6% in those with typical anatomy (p = 0.01). Mean operative time was significantly longer in patients with anatomical variations (78 ± 15 min vs. 56 ± 10 min, p < 0.001). Conversion to open surgery was required in 4 cases (2.6%), all of which had complex arterial variations.
Conclusion: Anatomical and physiological variations in the cystic artery are common and significantly increase the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative planning and meticulous dissection techniques are essential to minimize surgical risks. Awareness and anticipation of such variations can improve surgical outcomes and reduce the rate of complications and conversion to open procedures.
References
2. Perdikakis M, Liapi A, Kiriakopoulos A, Schizas D, Menenakos E, Lyros O. Anatomical variations of the cystic artery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A persisting surgical challenge. Cureus. 2024;16(8).
3. Singh H, Singh NK, Kaul RK, Gupta A, Tiwari S. Prevalence of anatomical variations of cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. International Surgery Journal. 2019;6(10):3781-5.
4. Karunarathna I, Godage S, Rodrigo P, Jayawardana A, Fernando C, Vidanagama U, et al. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Techniques, Complications, Clinical Implications, and Anaesthetic Consideration.
5. Gejje S, Hongal A, Srimurthy K, Ravishankar H, Khuller S. Aprospective study of the laparoscopic anatomy of calot's triangle, variations and its surgical implications. Int J Biol Med Res. 2014;5(4):4632-40.
6. Kosuri KC, Siddaraju K, Nelluri V. Anatomical and conge-nital anomalies of liver and gallbladder: Its embryogenesis and clinical implications. MedPulse-Res Publ. 2019;12(3).
7. Mischinger H-J, Wagner D, Kornprat P, Bacher H, Werkgartner G. The “critical view of safety (CVS)” cannot be applied—What to do? Strategies to avoid bile duct injuries. European Surgery. 2021;53(3):99-105.
8. Pol MM. The Effect of Various Surgical Techniques on Difficult Cholecystectomy Operations: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Colorectal Res. 2020;8(1):23-8.
9. Montalvo-Javé EE, Contreras-Flores EH, Ayala-Moreno EA, Mercado MA. Strasberg's Critical View: Strategy for a Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology. 2022;12(1):40.
10. Maruti Pol M. The effect of various surgical techniques in difficult cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Iranian Journal of Colorectal Research. 2020;8(1):23-8.
11. Bhandari TR, Shahi S, Bhandari R, Poudel R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: an experience at a tertiary care hospital in Western Nepal. Surgery research and practice. 2017;2017(1):8204578.
12. Ferzli G, Timoney M, Nazir S, Swedler D, Fingerhut A. Importance of the node of Calot in gallbladder neck dissection: an important landmark in the standardized approach to the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2015;25(1):28-32.
13. Zhang J-Y, Liu S-L, Feng Q-M, Gao J-Q, Zhang Q. Correlative evaluation of mental and physical workload of laparoscopic surgeons based on surface electromyography and eye-tracking signals. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):11095.
14. Dekker SW, Hugh TB. Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ journal of surgery. 2008;78(12):1109-14.
15. Habeeb TA, Abdouyassin M, Habib FM, Baghdadi MA. Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low-pressure pneumo-peritoneum in cardiopulmonary risk patients: Fundus-Calot cholecystectomy versus Calot first cholecystectomy. Randomized Controlled Trial. Surg Gastroenterol Oncol. 2021.
16. Tejaswi H, Dakshayani K. of the Article: Anatomical Variations in the Arterial Supply of Gall Bladders in South Indian Cadavers. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2014;8(1):1208.