ANTHROPOMETRIC STUDY OF THE CEPHALO-FACIAL PARAMETERS TO ESTIMATE RELATIONSHIP WITH STATURE OF AN INDIVIDUAL IN INDIAN POPULATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Forensic anthropology, Facial recognition, Stature, Cephalon facial dimensions, Facial dimensions, Human identification, medicolegal
Abstract
Estimating stature is crucial in forensic anthropology, especially while identifying people during criminal investigations, mass disasters, and cases involving unidentified human remains. The purpose of this study is to establish regression equations to evaluate stature using cephalofacial features in a heterogeneous sample of Indian MBBS students. The study included 100 participants (50 males and 50 females) aged 18 to 25 years who selected using convenience sampling. Cephalofacial measurements were recorded using calibrated anthropometric devices such as digital vernier calipers, spreading calipers, and measuring tapes. Regression analysis was then utilized to generate predictive equations for estimating stature using these variables.
The strongest association was established between stature and horizontal head circumference (r = 0.448), followed by physiognomic face length. Nasal breadth showed the least correlation (r = -0.173). For each parameter, regression equations were developed, and standard errors of estimation were determined. Horizontal head circumference was determined as the most reliable criterion for estimating stature, followed by physiognomic face length. The research shows that cephalofacial measures can be used to determine stature with high accuracy, especially when only cephalofacial remains are available. The findings highlight the significance of cephalofacial characteristics in forensic investigations, particularly when alternative sources of stature data are lacking. These findings provide significant forensic tools for estimating stature in the Indian population.
References
2. Krishan K. Estimation of stature from cephalo-facial anthropometry in north Indian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Oct 25;181(1–3):52.e1-6.
3. Sharma K. Concise textbook of forensic medicine and toxicology [Internet]. New Delhi: Global Education Consultants; 2011 [cited 2022 Jan 7]. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/
4. Yadav AB, Kale AD, Mane DR, Yadav SK, Hallikerimath S. Stature estimation from regression analysis of facial anthropometry in Indian population. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol JOMFP. 2019 Aug;23(2):311.
5. Krogman WM, İşcan MY. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd ed. Springfield, Ill., U.S.A: C.C. Thomas; 1986. 551 p.
6. Fang F, Clapham PJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):874–81.
7. Zacharopoulos GV, Manios A, Kau CH, Velagrakis G, Tzanakakis GN, de Bree E. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face. J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jan;27(1):e71-75.
8. Husein OF, Sepehr A, Garg R, Sina-Khadiv M, Gattu S, Waltzman J, et al. Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman’s face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS. 2010 Nov;63(11):1825–31.
9. Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S65–71.
10. Agnihotri AK, Kachhwaha S, Googoolye K, Allock A. Estimation of stature from cephalo-facial dimensions by regression analysis in Indo-Mauritian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011 May;18(4):167–72.
11. Stratton SJ. Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2021 Aug;36(4):373–4.
12. Martini M, Klausing A, Lüchters G, Heim N, Messing-Jünger M. Head circumference - a useful single parameter for skull volume development in cranial growth analysis Head Face Med. 2018 Jan 10;14:3.
13. Smith AC, Boaks A. Consistency of selected craniometric landmark locations and the resulting variation in measurements. Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Nov;280:156–63.
14. Schober P, Vetter TR. Linear Regression in Medical Research. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jan;132(1):108–9.
15. Patil KR, Mody RN. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis and stature by regression analysis: a lateral cephalometric study. Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Jan 29;147(2–3):175–80.
16. González-Colmenares G, Medina CS, Báez LC. Estimation of stature by cephalometric facial dimensions in skeletonized bodies: study from a sample modern Colombians skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jan;258:101.e1-6.
17. Wankhede KP, Kamdi NY, Parchand MP, Anjankar VP, Bardale RV. Estimation of stature from maxillo-facial anthropometry in a central Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012 Jan;4(1):34–7.
18. Kharyal A, Nath S. Estimation of Stature from Maxillo-Facial Measurements among Brahmins of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J Forensic Odontol. 2008; 1: 9-12.
19. Albanese J, Osley SE, Tuck A. Do group-specific equations provide the best estimates of stature? Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Apr 1;261:154–8.
20. Kyllonen KM, Simmons-Ehrhardt T, Monson KL. Stature estimation using measurements of the cranium for populations in the United States. Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Dec;281:184.e1-184.e9.
21. Pelin C, Zağyapan R, Yazici C, Kürkçüoğlu A. Body height estimation from head and face dimensions: a different method. J Forensic Sci. 2010 Sep;55(5):1326–30.
22. Agnihotri AK, Kachhwaha S, Jowaheer V, Singh AP. Estimating stature from percutaneous length of tibia and ulna in Indo-Mauritian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2009 May 30;187(1–3):109.e1-3.
23. Sahni D, Sanjeev, Sharma P, Harjeet, Kaur G, Aggarwal A. Estimation of stature from facial measurements in northwest Indians. Leg Med. 2010 Jan;12(1):23–7.