A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5% WITH FENTANYL VERSUS HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5% WITH NALBUPHINE AS ADJUVANTS IN PARTURIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE LSCS - A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLINDED STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Bupivacaine, Fentanyl, Lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), Nalbuphine, Spinal anaesthesia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bupivacaine is the most common among the local anesthetic drugs used for spinal anaesthesia. Fentanyl is a lipophilic opioid, with a rapid onset, improving the density of subarachnoid block without producing significant side effects and improves postoperative analgesia. Nalbuphine, a mixed agonist‐antagonist opioid, has the potential to attenuate μ‐opioid effects and to enhance the kappa‐opioid effects. It produces analgesia without the undesirable side effects of a μ agonist. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effect of intrathecal fentanyl versus intrathecal nalbuphine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged between 20 to 35 years, scheduled for elective LSCS, were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 each. The study medication (2.5 ml of the drug solution) was prepared by the anesthesiologist who did not take part in the study. Group BF (n=30) parturient received 2.25 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.25 ml fentanyl (12.5 mcg), Group BN (n=30) parturient received 2.25 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.25 ml nalbuphine (250 mcg). Onset time of sensory and motor block, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, duration of analgesia, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects were documented. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and Heart rate (HR) were recorded at varied intervals during intraoperative and postoperative period.
RESULTS: There was no pain in both groups at 1st and 2nd hours. At 5th hours after surgery VAS score were significant as p‐ value <0.05 but at 12 hours and 24 hours, it was statistically non‐significant as p‐ value > 0.05. The time to first analgesic requirement was significantly prolonged in Group BN as compared to Group BF (p < 0.001). No difference in sensory onset and motor blockage in both groups. The time to attain peak sensory level were comparable in both groups. Rescue analgesia requirement was more in group BF compared to group BN in first 24 hours. No significant changes in hemodynamics were observed.
CONCLUSION: When comparing between the two given opioids, addition of nalbuphine 250mcg to hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%(10mg) provide efficient and prolonged postoperative analgesia with minimum or no side effects (Pruritus, nausea, respiratory depression) than addition of fentanyl 12.5mcg to same baricity and dose of bupivacaine.
References
[2] Chu CC, Shu SS, Lin SM, et al. The effect of intrathecal bupivacaine with combined fentanyl in cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 1995;33(3):149-54.
[3] Schmauss C, Doherty C, Yaksh TL. The analgetic effects of an intrathecally administered partial opiate agonist, nalbuphine hydrochloride. Eur J Pharmacol 1982;86(1):1-7.
[4] Raghuraman M. Intrathecal nalbuphine – Will it gain wider acceptance? - A narrative review. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia 2017;33(3):289-93.
[5] Bromage PR. Epidural Analgesia. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1978: p. 144.
[6] Zeng Z, Lu J, Shu C, et al. A comparision of nalbuphine with morphine for analgesic effects and safety: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scientific Report 2015;5:109-27.
[7] Verstraete S, Van de Velde M. Post caesarean section analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2012;63:147-67.
[8] Gehling M, Tryba M. Risks and side -effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: A meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2009;64:643-51.
[9] Bujedo BM, Santos SG, Azpiazu AV. A review of epidural and intrathecal opioids used in treatment of postoperative pain. J Opioid Manag 2012;8(3)177-92.
[10] Tawfik MO. Mode of action of intraspinal opioids. Pain Rev 1994;1:275-94.
[11] Terajima K, Onodera H, Kobayashi M, et al. Efficacy of intrathecal morphine for analgesia following elective cesarean section: comparison with previous delivery. Journal of Nippon Medical School 2003;70(4):327–33.
[12] Culebras X, Gaggero G, Zatloukal J, et al. Advantages of intrathecal nalbuphine, compared with intrathecal morphine, after cesarean delivery: an evaluation of postoperative analgesia and adverse effects. Anesth Analg 2000;91:601-5.
[13] Ahmed FI. Intrathecal nalbuphine versus fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section: a randomized double-blinded study. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care 2019;6:112-8.
[14] Tiwari AK, Tomar GS, Agrawal J. Intrathecal bupivacaine in comparison with a combination of nalbuphine and bupivacaine for subarachnoid block. American Journal of Therapeutics. 2013;20(6):592–5.
[15] Bindra TK, Kumar P, Jindal G. Postoperative analgesia with intrathecal nalbuphine versus intrathecal fentanyl in caesarean section: a double blind randomized comparative study. Anesth Essays Res 2018;12:561-5.
[16] Gupta K, Rastogi B, Gupta P, et al. Intrathecal nalbuphine versus intrathecal fentanyl as adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery of lower limbs under subarachnoid block: a comparative evaluation. Indian Journal of Pain 2016;30(2):90.
[17] Garg K, Garg P, Katyal S. Comparative analysis of intrathecal nalbuphine vs fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for urological procedures. MGM J Med Sci 2020;7:203.
[18] Gomaa HM, Mohamed NN, Zoheir HA, et al. A comparison between post-operative analgesia after intrathecal nalbuphine with bupivacaine and intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine after caesarean section. Egypt J Anaesth 2014;30:405-10.