INTRASCROTAL SWELLINGS: A SINGLE CENTER CROSS-SECTIONAL PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON CLINICOHISTOPATHOLOGICAL PROFILE WITH REFERENCE TO DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS.

Main Article Content

Nabarun Manna
Debajit Das
Somnath Ghosh

Keywords

Varicocele, hydrocele, orchitis, epididymitis, seminoma, testicular tuberculosis

Abstract

Background: Intrascrotal swellings are a pretty common entity faced by surgeons and surgical pathologists. The etiology ranges from inflammatory, infective to neoplastic proportions. Scrotal ultrasound (USG) plays a critical role in formulating management plan as many entities respond to conservative treatment without any need of surgical intervention.


 


Aims and Objective: The study was conducted to acquire an in-depth knowledge on varied presentations, public health implications and to evaluate the role of ultrasound imaging in the light of operative findings and histopathological examination (HPE) where definitive surgical management was carried out.


 


Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on one hundred voluntary participants presenting with intrascrotal swelling in the surgical outpatient and emergency units at a tertiary care center following approval of the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent and assent as applicable; excluding inguinal swellings, scrotal skin lesions and moribund patients. Clinicodemographic variables, imaging results, operative record and HPE findings were assessed, analyzed and correlated with appropriate statistical principles.


 


Results: Middle aged population between 30 and 60 years constituted the majority with a mean of 41.45 years of the study participants. Commonest intrascrotal pathology was vaginal hydrocele (62%), followed by epididymo-orchitis (40%). USG findings correlated with HPE results at a significance level of 0.05.


Conclusion: The study revealed scrotal USG as an important tool to guide management and identified key areas of public health concerns to initiate awareness campaigns.

Abstract 64 | PDF Downloads 29

References

1. Standring S, editor. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015.
2. Woodward PJ, Schwab CM, Sesterhenn IA. From the archives of the AFIP: extratesticular scrotal masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003 Jan-Feb;23(1):215-40. doi: 10.1148/rg.231025133. PMID: 12533657.
3. Rubenstein RA, Dogra VS, Seftel AD, Resnick MI. Benign intrascrotal lesions. J Urol. 2004 May;171(5):1765-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000123083.98845.88. PMID: 15076274.
4. Muttarak M, Chaiwun B. Painless scrotal swelling: ultrasonographical features with pathological correlation. Singapore Med J. 2005 Apr;46(4):196-201; quiz 202. PMID: 15800728.
5. Saha I, Paul B. Essentials of Biostatistics & Research Methodology. 5th edition. Kolkata: Academic Publishers; 2025.
6. Romero FR, Romero AW, Almeida RM, Oliveira FC Jr, Tambara Filho R. Prevalence and risk factors for scrotal lesions/anomalies in a cohort of Brazilian men ≥ 40 years of age. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(2):73-9. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1322495. PMID: 24714986; PMCID: PMC10896572.
7. Gyapong JO, Webber RH, Morris J, Bennett S. Prevalence of hydrocele as a rapid diagnostic index for lymphatic filariasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Jan-Feb;92(1):40-3. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(98)90948-8. PMID: 9692148.
8. Mishra S, Achary KG, Mandal NN, Tripathy A, Kar SK, Bal MS. Hydrocele fluid: can it be used for immunodiagnosis of lymphatic filariasis? J Vector Borne Dis. 2014 Sep;51(3):188-93. PMID: 25253211.
9. Stonier T, Simson N, Challacombe B. Diagnosing testicular lumps in primary care. Practitioner. 2017 Apr;261(1803):13-7. PMID: 29020728.
10. Krieger JN. Epididymitis, orchitis, and related conditions. Sex Transm Dis. 1984 Jul-Sep;11(3):173-81. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198407000-00012. PMID: 6390741.
11. Walker NA, Challacombe B. Managing epididymo-orchitis in general practice. Practitioner. 2013 Apr;257(1760):21-5, 2-3. PMID: 23724748.
12. Chattopadhyay A, Bhatnagar V, Agarwala S, Mitra DK. Genitourinary tuberculosis in pediatric surgical practice. J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Sep;32(9):1283-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90302-x. PMID: 9314243.
13. Johnson WD Jr., Jonhson CW, Lowe FC. Tuberculosis and parasitic diseases of the genitourinary system. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2002.pp:743-95
14. Belker AM. The varicocele and male infertility. Urol Clin North Am. 1981 Feb;8(1):41-51. PMID: 7210353.
15. Orda R, Sayfan J, Manor H, Witz E, Sofer Y. Diagnosis of varicocele and postoperative evaluation using inguinal ultrasonography. Ann Surg. 1987 Jul;206(1):99-101. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198707000-00015. PMID: 3300579; PMCID: PMC1492929.
16. Annoni F, Colpi GM, Marincola FM, Negri L. Doppler examination in varicocele. A standard method of evaluation. J Androl. 1988 Jul-Aug;9(4):248-52. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1988.tb01046.x. PMID: 3053549.
17. Boujelbene N, Cosinschi A, Boujelbene N, Khanfir K, Bhagwati S, Herrmann E, Mirimanoff RO, Ozsahin M, Zouhair A. Pure seminoma: a review and update. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Aug 8;6:90. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-90. PMID: 21819630; PMCID: PMC3163197.
18. Alexander EJ, White IM, Horwich A. Update on management of seminoma. Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):82-91. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60451. PMID: 20535292; PMCID: PMC2878 445.
19. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):133-4. PMID: 20610543.
20. Mottet N, Culine S, Iborra F, Avances C, Bastide C, Lesourd A, Michel F, Rigaud J. Tumeurs du testicule [Testicular tumors]. Prog Urol. 2007 Nov;17(6):1035-45. French. doi: 10.1016/s1166-7087(07)74779-6. PMID: 18153986.