“CORRELATION BETWEEN PSA LEVELS AND GLEASON SCORE IN PROSTATE CANCER: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY CONDUCTED AT THE EASTERN PROVINCE OF INDIA”

Main Article Content

Dr. Supti Mukhopadhyay (Banerjee)

Keywords

Prostate cancer, PSA, Gleason score, Histopathology, Tumor grade, Eastern India, Prognosis

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in men, and its prognosis largely depends on tumor grade and stage at diagnosis. Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Gleason scoring are two important parameters used in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of prostate carcinoma. This study aimed to assess the correlation between serum PSA levels and histological Gleason scores in prostate cancer patients from Eastern India.


Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over one year at Rishi Pathological Laboratory, Kolkata, including 30 histologically confirmed cases of prostate carcinoma. Serum PSA levels were measured using chemiluminescence immunoassay, and prostate biopsies were graded according to the Gleason scoring system. Patients were categorized into PSA ranges (≤10 ng/mL, 10.1–20 ng/mL, >20 ng/mL) and Gleason score groups (≤6, 7, ≥8). Spearman’s rank correlation was used to evaluate the association between PSA levels and Gleason scores.


Results: The majority of patients (43.3%) had PSA levels >20 ng/mL, and 43.3% had Gleason scores ≥8. A strong positive correlation was found between PSA levels and Gleason score (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Higher PSA levels were significantly associated with higher Gleason grades, indicating a relationship between serum PSA concentration and tumor aggressiveness.


Conclusion: This study demonstrates a significant positive correlation between serum PSA levels and Gleason score in prostate cancer patients. These findings support the combined use of PSA and Gleason grading for prognostication and risk stratification, especially in resource-limited settings like Eastern India where screening is still evolving.

Abstract 229 | Pdf Downloads 56

References

1. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J SurgPathol. 2016;40(2):244-252.
2. Balk SP, Ko YJ, Bubley GJ. Biology of prostate-specific antigen. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(2):383-391.
3. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol. 1974;111(1):58-64.
4. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.
5. National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR). Consolidated report of hospital-based cancer registries 2021. ICMR, Bengaluru.
6. NCRP (National Cancer Registry Programme), ICMR. Three-year Report of the Population-Based Cancer Registries: 2020-2022, West Bengal and Eastern India zones.
7. Hernandez DJ, Nielsen ME, Han M, et al. Tumor grade and stage at presentation in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Natl ComprCancNetw. 2009;7(2):147–152.
8. Berger AP, Spranger R, Rogatsch H, et al. PSA level and its relationship with Gleason score and tumor volume. Prostate. 2005;62(3):224–231.
9. Narayana AS, Prakash G, Singh R. Correlation of PSA levels with Gleason score in prostate carcinoma: An Indian experience. Indian J Urol. 2017;33(2):121–126.
10. Roy S, Ghosh M, Chatterjee U. Association of serum PSA with histological grade in prostate cancer: A Kolkata-based study. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2020;7(9):445–449.
11. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Egevad LL. ISUP consensus on Gleason grading. Am J SurgPathol. 2005;29(9):1228–1242.
12. Lazzeri M, Haese A, Abrate A, et al. Clinical performance of serum PSA in combination with Gleason score. EurUrol Suppl. 2013;12(1):26–32.
13. Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a PSA level ≤4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2239–2246.