COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN CAUDAL EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTION AND TRANSFORAMINAL BLOCK FOR POST-LUMBAR SURGERY SYNDROME

Main Article Content

Dr. Chevuru Monica
Dr. Devaram Vijetha
Dr. Gundlakunta Swathi
Dr. Griddaluru Deepthi
Dr. K Krishna Chaitanya
Dr. Valluri Anil Kumar

Keywords

Post-lumbar surgery syndrome, caudal epidural steroid injection, transforaminal block, mODI, NRS.

Abstract

Introduction: Post-lumbar surgery syndrome (PLSS) may result, often attributed to epidural fibrosis. Minimally invasive interventions like caudal epidural steroid injections (CESI) offer relief, especially when surgical revisions have high risks. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are commonly used and target-specific, effectively managing PLSS unresponsive to conservative therapies.


Materials and Methods: The study included 40 patients in each group (CESI and TFESI) who met specific criteria: aged 18-65, with a recent single-level nonfusion discectomy, evidence of epidural fibrosis (EF) on MRI, and persistent low back and leg pain unresponsive to conservative treatments. Exclusion criteria included multilevel EF, previous fusion surgery, recurrent disc hernia, and other spinal conditions. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI) were assessed before and after the procedure at various time points.


Observations and Results: Age did not significantly differ between CESI (M = 52.78 ± 7.99) and TFESI (M = 49.65 ± 9.79) groups (p = 0.122). The gender distribution did not significantly differ between the CESI and TFESI groups (p = 0.823). The distribution of ASA categories did not significantly differ between CESI and TFESI groups (p = 0.822). BMI did not significantly differ between CESI and TFESI groups (p = 0.195). Among the NRS scores, only the 1st day showed a significant difference between the CESI and TFESI groups (p = 0.033). The mean NRS score for CESI at 1st day was 0.23 ± 0.39, while for  TFESI it was 0.45 ± 0.51. Significant differences in Oswestry Disability Index scores were found at 6 hours (p = 0.001), 12 hours (p < 0.0001), 5th day (p = 0.002), and 1 week (p = 0.002) post-procedure, with CESI group reporting lower mean scores compared to TFESI at these time points.


Discussion: CESI offered quicker pain alleviation and enhanced early functional progress than TFESI, especially during the initial week. Both methods demonstrated comparable long-term results in pain and disability scores by the 3-month follow-up.


Conclusion: CESI provides better early symptom relief in PLSS, whereas CESI and TFESI are similarly effective over the long term. CESI might be favored for faster recovery, particularly in situations involving significant epidural fibrosis.

Abstract 109 | PDF Downloads 47

References

1. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259.
2. Thomson S. Failed back surgery syndrome - definition, epidemiology and demographics. Br J Pain. 2013 Feb;7(1):56-9.
3. Orhurhu VJ, Chu R, Gill J. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome. [Updated 2023 May 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan.
4. Carassiti M, Pascarella G, Strumia A, Russo F, Papalia GF, Cataldo R et al. Epidural Steroid Injections for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 26;19(1):231.
5. Hashemi M, Khoshooei A, Amanollahi A, Asgari S. Comparative Evaluation of Caudal Epidural Method to Ultrasound-Guided S1 Transforamen Block in Patient's Lumbar Discectomy with Failed Back Syndrome Symptoms: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Dec 29;13(6):e137325.
6. Celenlioglu AE, Sencan S, Bilim S, Sancar M, Gunduz OH. Comparison of Caudal Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome After Single-level Discectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):161-169.
7. Ozturk EC, Sacaklidir R, Sencan S, Gunduz OH. Caudal epidural steroid injection versus transforaminal ESI for unilateral S1 radiculopathy: a pro
8. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–3.
9. Rosenberg SK, Grabinsky A, Kooser C, Boswell MV. Effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injections in low back pain: a one year experience. Pain Physician. 2002 Jul;5(3):266-70.
10. Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with postlumbar surgery syndrome. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):214-8.
11. Akkaya T, Ozkan D, Kertmen H, Sekerci Z. Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections in Postlaminectomy Patients: Comparison of Ultrasonography and Fluoroscopy. Turk Neurosurg. 2017;27(3):420-425.
12. Liu J, Zhou H, Lu L, Li X, Jia J, Shi Z, et al. The Effectiveness of Transforaminal Versus Caudal Routes for Epidural Steroid Injections in Managing Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(18):e3373.
13. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA. Comparison of the efficacy of caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar disc herniation: is one method superior to the other? Korean J Pain. 2015 Jan;28(1):11-21.

Most read articles by the same author(s)