INTERWEAVING OR RE-ROUTING OF THE CONJOINT TENDON THROUGH THE SUBSCAPULARIS IS A RELIABLE METHOD FOR ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY WITHOUT LABRAL TEAR OR BONE LOSS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Anterior Shoulder Instability, Re-Routing of Subscapularis, Dynamic Reinforcement
Abstract
Background
Recurrent anterior instability has diverse aetiologies and multiple treatment options. Bankart lesion and Hill Sachs lesion are two main recognized causes but in many cases, neither of these can be found. When Bankart lesion is found, arthroscopic Bankart repair has been accepted as treatment of choice, but instability or apprehension persisted or recurred in nearly 40 % cases. Some imitation of motion is almost invariable after the Laterjet procedure due to fixed mechanical blockage. An acceptable alternative should also be there. Interweaving or re-routing of the conjoint tendon through the Subscapularis is relatively simple operation where reinforcement is dynamic, i.e. maximum in abducted position when it is really needed.
Method
In this procedure, shoulder is exposed through the anterior approach, conjoint tendon is separated and detached along with 1 cm of coracoid process which is predrilled, the conjoint tendon is passed posteriorly first and then bought back anteriorly through the Subscapularis i.e., interwoven through it, and finally, the tip of the coracoid process is re-attached to its original position with a cancellous screw.
Results
I have used this method in 11 cases of recurrent anterior instability who did not have obvious glenoid labrum tear or bone loss and have found satisfactory results without complications for two years in 10 patents; one patients was lost in follow-up.
Conclusion
If no specific aetiology is found on MRI or the facility of shoulder arthroscopy is lacking, re-routing of conjoint tendon can be a good alternative.
References
2. Millett PJ, Clavert P, Warner JJ. Open operative treatment for anterior shoulder instability: when and why? JBJS 2005;87(2):419-32.
3. Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. JBJS 2006;88(8):1755-63.
4. Zimmermann SM, Scheyerer MJ, Farshad M, et al. Long-term restoration of anterior shoulder stability: a retrospective analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure. JBJS 2016;98(23):1954-61.
5. Dahm DL. Is open stabilization superior to arthroscopic stabilization for the treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability? Commentary on an article by Nicholas GH Mohtadi, MD, MSc, FRCSC, et al.:“A randomized clinical trial comparing open and arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Two-year follow-up with disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes”. JBJS 2014;96(5):e41.
6. Lenters TR, Franta AK, Wolf FM, et al. Arthroscopic compared with open repairs for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. JBJS 2007;89(2):244-54.
7. Provencher MT, Ferrari MB, Sanchez G, et al. Current treatment options for glenohumeral instability and bone loss: a critical analysis review. JBJS Reviews 2017;5(7):e6.
8. Privitera DM, Sinz NJ, Miller LR, et al. Clinical outcomes following the Latarjet procedure in contact and collision athletes. JBJS 2018;100(6):459-65.
9. Shah AA, Butler RB, Romanowski Jet al. Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure. JBJS. 2012;94(6):495-501.
10. Moroder P, Odorizzi M, Pizzinini S, et al. Open Bankart repair for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability without substantial osseous glenoid defects: results after a minimum follow-up of twenty years. JBJS 2015;97(17):1398-405.