ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE PRACTICES AND RESTORATION LONGEVITY IN CHILDREN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Suffiyan Saleem
Dr Sana Idrees
Dr Usman Nazir
Dr. Sajjad Ali Darvesh
Dr. Jai Lalita
Dr. Zubair Nasir

Keywords

Oral hygiene, restoration longevity, dental caries, composite, glass ionomer cement

Abstract

Background: The longevity of dental restorations in paediatric patients is influenced by various factors, among which oral hygiene practices play a pivotal role. Understanding the relationship between hygiene behaviours and restoration durability can aid in improving clinical outcomes and parental education.


Aim: To assess the association between oral hygiene practices and the clinical status of existing restorations in children aged 6–12 years.


Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 children attending a Paediatric/ Operative department. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire to evaluate oral hygiene practices, including brushing frequency, technique, fluoride use, and parental supervision. Clinical examination was performed to assess the integrity of restorations (GIC and composite), presence of secondary caries, marginal adaptation, and wear. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square and logistic regression tests to identify significant associations.


Results: Children who brushed twice daily under parental supervision had a restoration failure rate of 12.5%, significantly lower than the 36.8% observed in children who brushed once daily without supervision (p = 0.004). The use of fluoridated toothpaste was associated with a 21.3% failure rate, compared to 38.6% in non-fluoride users (p = 0.011). Composite restorations had a higher failure rate (32.9%) compared to GIC restorations (18.4%) in children with poor oral hygiene (p = 0.03). Overall, proper hygiene practices showed a strong correlation with increased restoration longevity.


Conclusion: Oral hygiene practices have a significant impact on the longevity of restorations in children. Parental involvement and consistent use of fluoridated toothpaste are key factors in enhancing the durability of restorations. These findings highlight the need for reinforcing oral hygiene education as part of paediatric dental care.

Abstract 103 | Pdf Downloads 48

References

1. Salas-Huamani JR, Sousa KG, Gomes GF, Silva AF, Silva TL, Carvalho FG, Rocha RA, Barbosa TD. Association of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life with the Longevity of ART-Restorations in Children. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2023 Nov 27;23:e220056.
2. Santos MJ, Zare E, McDermott P, Santos Junior GC. Multifactorial Contributors to the Longevity of Dental Restorations: An Integrated Review of Related Factors. Dentistry Journal. 2024 Sep 12;12(9):291.
3. Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Montagner AF, de Lima VP, Correa MB, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials. Dental Materials. 2023 Jan 1;39(1):1-2.
4. Noaman BR. The relationship of caries risk and oral hygiene level with placement and replacement of dental restorations. Acta medica academica. 2021 Jan 1.
5. Krol DM, Whelan K, Section on Oral Health. Maintaining and improving the oral health of young children. Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1):e2022060417.
6. Zou J, Du Q, Ge L, Wang J, Wang X, Li Y, Song G, Zhao W, Chen X, Jiang B, Mei Y. Expert consensus on early childhood caries management. International journal of oral science. 2022 Dec;14(1):35.
7. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. Journal of Dentistry. 2012 Oct 1;40(10):829-35.
8. Laitala ML, Alanen P, Isokangas P, Söderling E, Pienihäkkinen K. Long‐term effects of maternal prevention on children's dental decay and need for restorative treatment. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2013 Dec;41(6):534-40.
9. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. Journal of dental research. 1997 Jul;76(7):1387-96.
10. Dumitrescu R, Sava-Rosianu R, Jumanca D, Balean O, Damian LR, Fratila AD, Maricutoiu L, Hajdu AI, Focht R, Dumitrache MA, Daguci C. The impact of parental education on schoolchildren’s oral health—a multicenter cross-sectional study in Romania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11102.
11. Erwin J, Paisi M, Neill S, Burns L, Vassallo I, Nelder A, Facenfield J, Devalia U, Vassallo T, Witton R. Factors influencing oral health behaviours, access and delivery of dental care for autistic children and adolescents: A mixed‐methods systematic review. Health Expectations. 2022 Aug;25(4):1269-318.
12. Santos MJ, Zare E, McDermott P, Santos Junior GC. Multifactorial Contributors to the Longevity of Dental Restorations: An Integrated Review of Related Factors. Dentistry Journal. 2024 Sep 12;12(9):291.
13. Wong HM. Childhood caries management. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):8527.
14. Alamri H. Oral care for children with special healthcare needs in dentistry: a literature review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022 Jan;11(19):5557.

Most read articles by the same author(s)