TO ASSESS THE ACCURACY OF PREDICTIVE MORTALITY OF ROTTERDAM VERSUS MARSHALL CT SCORE FOLLOWING SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Main Article Content

Dr Barkat Ullah
Dr Inayat Ali Khan
Dr Asif Nawaz
Dr Muhammad Asad Khan
Dr Sana Ilyas
Dr Hani Suhail

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury, prognosis, emergency, mortality

Abstract

Background: Rapid and appropriate identification and prognostic prediction of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the emergency department (ED) are essential for decreasing the risk of mortality. Computed tomography (CT) diagnostic methods developed by Rotterdam and Marshall have been shown to be quite helpful in predicting the likely outcome of TBI patients.


Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Rotterdam CT score with the Marshall CT score in predicting death after severe TBI.


Methods: A longitudinal research on adult severe TBI patients was conducted in the ED of Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi. Ninety severe TBI patients, aged over 18 years, were consecutively enrolled from 23-08-2023. To 22-02-2024 Vitals were recorded after demographic and trauma information was obtained. To confirm severe TBI, each patient's GCS score was calculated, and a CT scan was performed at admission. The Marshall and Rotterdam CT scores were calculated to predict their likelihood of death. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the data.


Results: Of the 90, 68.9% (n=62) were male patients, and 31.1% (n=28) were female patients, with a median age of 34.0 years. The predicted mortality from severe TBI with Rotterdam and Marshall CT scores ≥4 was 31.1% (n=28) and 44.4% (n=44), respectively. The actual mortality from severe TBI within 30 days of diagnosis was 41.1% (n=37). The Rotterdam and Marshall CT scores ≥4 predicted the mortality with a sensitivity of 62.2% and 83.8%, specificity of 90.6% and 83.1%, PPV of 82.2% and 77.5%, NPV of 77.5% and 88.0%, and DA of 78.9% and 83.4%, respectively.


Conclusion: Severe TBI patients have a higher chance of mortality if they score ≥4 on the Rotterdam and Marshall CT scores. These scoring methods are supported by the results of our study, which showed that a cutoff score of ≥4 was associated with poor survival and <4 with better survival.

Abstract 108 | Pdf Downloads 35

References

1. Crupi R, Cordaro M, Cuzzocrea S, Impellizzeri D. Management of traumatic brain injury: from present to future. Antioxidants. 2020 Apr 2;9(4):297.
2. Dixon J, Comstock G, Whitfield J, Richards D, Burkholder TW, Leifer N, et al. Emergency department management of traumatic brain injuries: a resource tiered review. Afr J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 1;10(3):159-66.
3. Shaikh F, Munakomi S, Waseem M. Head Trauma (Archived). In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan.
4. Reid LD, Fingar KR. Inpatient Stays and Emergency Department Visits Involving Traumatic Brain Injury, 2017. 2020 Mar 31.
5. GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan;18(1):56-87.
6. Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-97.
7. Iaccarino C, Carretta A, Nicolosi F, Morselli C. Epidemiology of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Sci. 2018 Oct;62(5):535-41.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). TBI data [Internet]. CDC; 2023.
9. Yaqoob U, Javeed F, Rehman L, Pahwani M, Madni S, Uddin MM. Emergency department outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury–a retrospective study from Pakistan. Pak J Neurol Surg. 2021 Jun 25;25(2):237-44.
10. Ahmed AA. A review of serial brain ct in patients with traumatic brain injury: a tertiary care experience. Pak J Radiol. 2020 Feb 1;29(4):245-51.
11. Pisano F, Bilotta F. The predictive value of the verbal glasgow coma scale in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024 Jul 1;39(4):273-83.
12. Rezaee M, Nasehi MM, Effatpanah M, Jabbaripour S, Ghamkhar M, Karami H, et al. Overutilization of head computed tomography in cases of mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(4):551-65.
13. Asim M, El-Menyar A, Parchani A, Nabir S, Ahmed MN, Ahmed Z, et al. Rotterdam and Marshall scores for prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study. Brain Inj. 2021 Jun 7;35(7):803-11..
14. Wu H, Wright DW, Allen JW, Ding V, Boothroyd D, Glushakova OY, et al. Accuracy of head computed tomography scoring systems in predicting outcomes for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a ProTECT III ancillary study. Neuroradiol J. 2023 Feb;36(1):38-48.
15. Elkbuli A, Shaikh S, McKenney K, Shanahan H, McKenney M, McKenney K. Utility of the Marshall & Rotterdam classification scores in predicting outcomes in trauma patients. J Surg Res. 2021 Aug 1;264:194-8.
16. Rodrigues de Souza M, Aparecida Côrtes M, Carlos Lucena da Silva G, Jorge Fontoura Solla D, Garcia Marques E, Luz Oliveira Junior W, et al. Evaluation of Computed Tomography Scoring Systems in the Prediction of Short-Term Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients from a Low- to Middle-Income Country. Neurotrauma Rep. 2022 Apr 14;3(1):168-77.
17. Haarbauer-Krupa J, Pugh MJ, Prager EM, Harmon N, Wolfe J, Yaffe K. Epidemiology of chronic effects of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec 1;38(23):3235-47.
18. Fesharaki-Zadeh A, Datta D. An overview of preclinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI): relevance to pathophysiological mechanisms. Front Cell Neurosci. 2024 Apr 12;18:1371213.
19. Dheansa S, Rajwani KM, Pang G, Bench S, Kailaya-Vasan A, Maratos E, et al. Relationship between guideline adherence and outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 May 26;105(5):400-6.
20. Goswami B, Nanda V, Kataria S, Kataria D, Kataria SV. Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury using the Rotterdam and Marshall CT scores: a retrospective study from western India. Cureus. 2023 Jul 8;15(7):351-7.
21. Mohammadifard M, Ghaemi K, Hanif H, Sharifzadeh G, Haghparast M. Marshall and Rotterdam computed tomography scores in predicting early deaths after brain trauma. Eur J Transl Myol. 2018 Jul 16;28(3):7542.
22. Liu MW, Ma ZQ, Liao RL, Chen WM, Zhang BR, Zhang QJ, et al. Incidence and mortality related risk factors in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a meta‑analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2025 Feb 24;29(4):84.
23. Okidi R, Ogwang DM, Okello TR, Ezati D, Kyegombe W, Nyeko D, et al. Factors affecting mortality after traumatic brain injury in a resource-poor setting. BJS Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):320-5.
24. Asim M, El-Menyar A, Parchani A, Nabir S, Ahmed MN, Ahmed Z, et al. Rotterdam and Marshall scores for prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: an observational study. Brain Inj. 2021 Jun 7;35(7):803-11.
25. Siahaan, A.M.P., Akbar, T.Y.M. and Nasution, M.D., 2018, March. The role of marshall and rotterdam score in predicting 30-day outcome of traumatic brain injury. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 125(3), p.012208.
26. Siahaan AM, Akbar TY, Nasution MD. The role of marshall and rotterdam score in predicting 30-day outcome of traumatic brain injury. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ. Sci. 2018 Mar;125(3):012208.