RADIOLOGICAL VS AUTOPSY FINDINGS IN GUNSHOT WOUND ASSESSMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Gunshot Wounds, Radiological Imaging, Autopsy, Forensic Pathology, Bullet Trajectory Detection
Abstract
Background: Gunshot wounds (GSWs) remain a significant public health and forensic concern in Pakistan, where firearm-related deaths are on the rise. Radiological imaging is emerging as a valuable adjunct to conventional autopsy in postmortem investigations.
Objective: To compare autopsy and radiological findings in fatal Gunshot wounds cases in Islamabad.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Radiology, HBS (Hazrat Bari Imam Sarkar) Medical and Dental College, Islamabad. The study was approved by the institutional ethical review board, and all procedures adhered to legal and ethical standards for research involving deceased individuals. The study covered 1-year period, from April 2024 to March 2025. A total of 68 medico-legal cases of firearm-related fatalities were selected through non-probability purposive sampling from DHQ Rawalpindi.Demographic data, radiological reports (primarily CT and X-rays), and autopsy findings were collected and analyzed for concordance. Statistical agreement was measured using the kappa coefficient.
Results: Of the 68 cases, 79.4% were male, with a predominance in the 31–45-year age group (39.7%). Radiological imaging detected entry and exit wounds in 94.1% and 85.2% of cases, respectively, while autopsy confirmed 100% and 91.1%. Cranial fractures showed a 94.1% concordance, and the kappa value for overall agreement was 0.812, indicating substantial agreement. However, radiology missed several soft tissue and visceral organ injuries, especially liver and cardiac lesions.
Conclusion: Radiological imaging, while not a substitute for autopsy, provides a valuable, non-invasive tool for documenting skeletal trauma, bullet trajectories, and retained projectiles
References
2. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Crime Statistics Report 2021. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan; 2022.
3. Hussain S, Mustehsan ZH, Syed S, Zeb M, Omer J, Riaz R. Pattern and demographic of firearm deaths in Rawalpindi and Islamabad: an autopsy-based study. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2020;70(5):1413–1418.
4. Shah SA, Mirza FH, Beg MA. An autopsy-based study of pattern of firearm injuries in Karachi, Pakistan. J Forensic Res. 2010;1(104):1–5.
5. Payne-James JJ, Jones R, Karch SB, Manlove J. Simpson’s Forensic Medicine. 14th ed. CRC Press; 2020.
6. Ross SG, Palmiere C. Radiological aspects of gunshot wounds. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019;39:1–9.
7. Christe A, Flach PM, Ross S, Spendlove D, Bolliger SA, Vock P, et al. Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging: friends or foes? Insights Imaging. 2012;3(5):533–546.
8. Rehman A, Ullah Z, Shah SA. Challenges in medico-legal autopsies in Pakistan: need for reform. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(10):1860–1862.
9. Khichi ZH, Saleem M, Khan FA. Medico-legal autopsy: knowledge, attitude, and practices of doctors in Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2021;33(2):242–245.
10. Ali M, Talpur MGA, Qazi SAF. Medico-legal evaluation of firearms injury cases in the hospital emergency unit in Hyderabad, Pakistan: a retrospective survey. J Peoples Univ Med Health SciNawabshah. 2020;10(4):100–105.
11. Punjab Health Department. Annual Health Statistics Report 2023. Lahore: Department of Health, Government of Punjab; 2023.
12. World Health Organization. Global status report on violence prevention 2021. Geneva: WHO Press; 2022.
13. Giraudo C, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C. Forensic imaging in gunshot wound cases: the value of radiology in medicolegal investigations. Radiol Med. 2021;126(9):1161–1172.
14. Hassan Q, Imran R, Ali MA. Pattern and outcome of firearm injuries: A retrospective study at tertiary care hospital in Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(6):1570–74.
15. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Global Study on Homicide 2023. Vienna: UNODC; 2023.
16. Egger C, Flach P, Doenz F, et al. Accuracy of PMCT in detection of gunshot wounds: A 10-year retrospective study. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(3):911–19.
17. Gascho D, Thali MJ, Christe A. Postmortem imaging of gunshot injuries: The complementary role of CT and MRI. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2020;16(1):70–81.
18. Polacco MA, Davidson TB, Wycoff SA, et al. Limitations of postmortem imaging in non-enhanced studies. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16(3):657–63.
19. Yen K, Vock P, Christe A, et al. Postmortem CT vs. autopsy in firearm deaths. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;330:111099.
20. Wichmann D, Vogel H, Vock P. Multicenter evaluation of postmortem CT and autopsy correlation in GSW fatalities. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2022;30:200439.
21. Baloch Z, Iqbal A, Ahmed M. Radiology infrastructure in forensic practice: Challenges in Pakistan. Pak J Forensic Med. 2023;4(1):17–22.
22. Saeed A, Abbas F. Religious and social barriers to autopsies in South Asia. Ethics Med. 2021;37(2):58–65.
23. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N. The role of Ai (autopsy imaging) in forensic medicine in Japan. Legal Med (Tokyo). 2021;49:102054.
24. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Annual Crime and Mortality Report 2023. Islamabad: PBS; 2023.
25. Zafar M, Khan F, Shahid A. Toward forensic radiology integration in Pakistan: A policy proposal. Health Syst Rev. 2024;5(2):101–09.