IMPACT OF MECONIUM-STAINED AMNIOTIC FLUID ON MATERNAL AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN TERM PREGNANCIES: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTER IN NORTH INDIA

Main Article Content

Dr Smita Singh
Dr Noopur Sharma
Dr Surbhi Singh

Keywords

Meconium-stained amniotic fluid, Meconium aspiration syndrome, Perinatal outcomes, Cesarean section, NICU admission, Term pregnancy

Abstract

Background: Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is a common finding in term pregnancies and is associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, particularly when meconium is thick. Early identification and appropriate management are crucial to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality.


Objectives: To evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with meconium-stained amniotic fluid in term pregnancies and to assess the impact of meconium consistency on these outcomes.


Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in North India from May 2013 to November 2013, including 68 term pregnant women with MSAF. Data were collected using a structured proforma. Maternal outcomes such as mode of delivery and intrapartum complications, and perinatal outcomes including Apgar scores, NICU admission, and meconium aspiration syndrome were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.


Results: Among 68 participants, 58.8% had thin meconium and 41.2% had thick meconium. Cesarean section rate was 38.2%, with significantly higher rates in the thick meconium group. Low Apgar score at 5 minutes was observed in 14.7% of neonates. NICU admission was required in 26.5% of cases, and meconium aspiration syndrome occurred in 8.8%. Thick meconium was significantly associated with low Apgar scores (p<0.05), increased NICU admissions (p<0.05), and higher incidence of MAS (p<0.05).


Conclusion: MSAF, particularly thick meconium, is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and higher operative delivery rates. Early recognition and appropriate management are essential to improve neonatal outcomes.


 

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References


1. Cunningham FG. Williams obstetricia. InWilliams obstetricia 2000 (pp. 1254-1254).
2. Katz VL, Bowes Jr WA. Meconium aspiration syndrome: reflections on a murky subject. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1992 Jan 1;166(1):171-83.
3. Sermon K, Goossens V, Seneca S, Lissens W, De Vos A. Maternaląfetal medicine and prenatal diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(415ą417):66.
4. Goudar SS, Somannavar MS, Clark R, Lockyer JM, Revankar AP, Fidler HM, Sloan NL, Niermeyer S, Keenan WJ, Singhal N. Stillbirth and newborn mortality in India after helping babies breathe training. Pediatrics. 2013 Feb 1;131(2):e344-52.
5. Shaikh EM, Mehmood S, Shaikh MA. Neonatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid-one year experience. JPMA. 2010;60(9):711-4.
6. Tinker A, ten Hoope-Bender P, Azfar S, Bustreo F, Bell R. A continuum of care to save newborn lives. The Lancet. 2005 Mar 5;365(9462):822-5.
7. Xu H, Mas-Calvet M, Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Fraser WD. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns in patients with thick meconium staining of the amniotic fluid: association with perinatal outcomes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009 Mar 1;200(3):283-e1.
8. Khatun MH, Arzu J, Haque E, Kamal MA, Al Mamun MA, Khan MF, Hoque MM. Fetal outcome in deliveries with meconium stained liquor. Bangladesh Journal of child health. 2009;33(2):41-5.
9. Mundhra R, Agarwal M. Fetal outcome in meconium stained deliveries. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013 Dec 15;7(12):2874.
10. Mazor M, Furman B, Wiznitzer A, Shoham-Vardi I, Cohen J, Ghezzi F. Maternal and perinatal outcome of patients with preterm labor and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1995 Nov 1;86(5):830-3.