PREVALENCE AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CERVICAL LESIONS IN WOMEN UNDERGOING BIOPSY FOR UNHEALTHY CERVIX: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Unhealthy cervix; cervical biopsy; histopathology; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; chronic cervicitis; squamous cell carcinoma; Pap smear; Adesh Medical College; Mohri Shahbad; Kurukshetra; Haryana
Abstract
Background
Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy among women in India, accounting for nearly one-quarter of the global cervical cancer burden, with approximately 122,000 new cases and 67,000 deaths annually. The clinical entity of 'unhealthy cervix' — characterized by erosion, hypertrophy, polyp, growth, or contact bleeding observed on per speculum examination — represents a heterogeneous spectrum spanning benign inflammatory conditions, premalignant intraepithelial lesions, and frank malignancy. Histopathological evaluation of biopsy specimens remains the gold-standard for definitive diagnosis, guiding management ranging from medical therapy for cervicitis through ablative or excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to radical surgery and chemoradiation for invasive cancer. Adesh Medical College & Hospital (AMCH), Mohri Shahbad, serves as the principal tertiary care referral center for Kurukshetra, Karnal, and Yamunanagar districts of Haryana — a region with predominantly rural-semiurban populations where reproductive tract infections, multiparity, early marriage, and limited cervical cancer screening collectively contribute to a substantial burden of unhealthy cervix presentations. No prior systematic AMCH analysis had characterized the institutional histopathological spectrum of cervical biopsies, correlated findings with clinical and demographic profiles, or evaluated the diagnostic performance of Pap smear against histopathology — generating an evidence gap for clinical protocol refinement and quality improvement initiatives.
Objectives
To determine the prevalence and histopathological spectrum of cervical lesions in women undergoing cervical biopsy for clinically unhealthy cervix at AMCH, Mohri Shahbad, during November 2016–August 2017; to correlate histopathological findings with demographic, clinical, and reproductive parameters; and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Pap smear against histopathology as the reference standard.
Methodology
Retrospective observational study using medical records and histopathology archives from AMCH Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pathology. Inclusion: women (≥21 years) with clinically unhealthy cervix on per speculum examination undergoing punch biopsy. Data extracted: demographics (age, parity, socioeconomic status), reproductive/sexual history, clinical findings (cervix appearance, contact bleeding), Pap smear cytology, and histopathological diagnosis (per WHO 2014 classification, Bethesda system for cytology). Tissue processing: 10% neutral buffered formalin fixation, paraffin embedding, 4-μm sections, hematoxylin & eosin staining; two-pathologist consensus diagnosis. Statistical analysis: IBM SPSS v24.0 — descriptive statistics, chi-square testing, Cohen's kappa for cytology-histology agreement, multivariate logistic regression for risk factor identification, ROC analysis. Significance: p<0.05 (two-tailed).
Results
298 women included: mean age 42.6±9.8 years; multiparous (≥4 children) 46.3%; age at first coitus <18 years 28.9%; lower socioeconomic status 59.1%. Per speculum findings: erosion 43.0%, hypertrophy 19.5%, polyp 14.1%, growth 8.1%, contact bleeding 15.4%. Histopathological spectrum: BENIGN 75.8% (226/298) — chronic non-specific cervicitis 37.6% (112), squamous metaplasia 15.4% (46), endocervical polyp 12.8% (38), koilocytic atypia 6.0% (18), nabothian cyst 4.0% (12); PREMALIGNANT 20.1% (60/298) — LSIL/CIN-1 10.7%, HSIL/CIN-2 5.4%, HSIL/CIN-3 4.0%; MALIGNANT 4.0% (12/298) — squamous cell carcinoma 2.7% (8), adenocarcinoma 1.3% (4). Pap smear performance against biopsy: sensitivity 76.4%, specificity 84.2%, PPV 68.6%, NPV 89.4%, kappa 0.62 (substantial agreement). Independent risk factors for premalignant/malignant pathology (multivariate): HIV-positive status (adjusted OR 5.62; 95% CI 2.18-14.52; p<0.001), multiple sexual partners (OR 4.18; 2.08-8.40; p<0.001), early coitarche <18 years (OR 3.86; 1.94-7.68; p<0.001), age >40 years (OR 2.86; 1.42-5.74; p=0.003), multiparity ≥4 (OR 2.94; 1.46-5.92; p=0.002).
Conclusion
Cervical biopsy of women with clinically unhealthy cervix at AMCH revealed predominantly benign pathology (75.8%), with clinically critical 24.2% premalignant/malignant lesions necessitating prompt intervention. Chronic cervicitis remained the dominant diagnosis (37.6%), reinforcing the role of reproductive tract infection management in this patient population. The 4.0% invasive carcinoma rate is consistent with published Indian tertiary-care series and underscores the value of biopsy in unhealthy cervix cases regardless of Pap result, as approximately one in four women with apparently inflammatory cytology had underlying CIN or carcinoma. The substantial Pap-biopsy concordance (kappa 0.62) supports cytology as a valuable triage tool, but the 31.4% false-negative rate among premalignant/malignant cases mandates direct biopsy whenever clinical examination is suspicious. Four institutional recommendations: (1) mandatory cervical biopsy in all women with persistently unhealthy cervix even with normal/inflammatory Pap; (2) opportunistic Pap screening integrated into all gynecologic OPD visits for women aged ≥30 years; (3) dedicated colposcopy clinic to enable directed biopsy and minimize sampling error; (4) targeted screening intensification for high-risk groups (HIV-positive, early coitarche, multiple partners, lower socioeconomic status). These findings will inform AMCH cervical screening protocol development and quality improvement initiatives.
References
2. Sreedevi A, Javed R, Dinesh A. Epidemiology of cervical cancer with special focus on India. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:405-14.
3. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12-9.
4. Misra JS, Srivastava S, Singh U, Srivastava AN. Risk-factors and strategies for control of carcinoma cervix in India: hospital based cytological screening experience of 35 years. Indian J Cancer. 2009;46(2):155-9.
5. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):890-907.
6. Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(10):954-62.
7. Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, Muwonge R, Swaminathan R, Shanthakumari S, et al. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9585):398-406.
8. Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, et al. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(5):1095-101.
9. Bal MS, Goyal R, Suri AK, Mohi MK. Detection of abnormal cervical cytology in Papanicolaou smears. J Cytol. 2012;29(1):45-7.
10. Sahasrabuddhe VV, Bhosale RA, Joshi SN, Kavatkar AN, Nagwanshi CA, Kelkar RS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of colposcopic-histopathologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8634.
11. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, et al. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1385-94.
12. Shastri SS, Mittra I, Mishra GA, Gupta S, Dikshit R, Singh S, et al. Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3):dju009.
13. Joshi C, Kujur P, Thakur N. Correlation of Pap smear with histopathological findings in detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of cervix. J Cytol. 2015;32(1):7-10.
14. Aswathy S, Quereshi MA, Kurian B, Leelamoni K. Cervical cancer screening: current knowledge & practice among women in a rural population of Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136(2):205-10.
15. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2014.
16. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2114-9.
17. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2016.
18. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-4.
19. Indian Council of Medical Research. Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants. New Delhi: ICMR; 2006.
20. Bobdey S, Sathwara J, Jain A, Balasubramaniam G. Burden of cervical cancer and role of screening in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2016;37(4):278-85.
21. Mishra GA, Pimple SA, Shastri SS. An overview of prevention and early detection of cervical cancers. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2011;32(3):125-32.
22. Murthy NS, Sehgal A, Satyanarayana L, Das DK, Singh V, Das BC, et al. Risk factors related to biological behaviour of precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. Br J Cancer. 1990;61(5):732-6.
23. Ranabhat SK, Shrestha R, Tiwari M. Analysis of abnormal epithelial lesions in cervical Pap smears in Mid-Western Nepal. J Pathol Nepal. 2011;1(1):30-3.
24. Munoz N, Castellsague X, de Gonzalez AB, Gissmann L. Chapter 1: HPV in the etiology of human cancer. Vaccine. 2006;24 Suppl 3:S3/1-10.
25. Park K. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 22nd ed. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2013. p. 374-7.
26. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55(4):244-65.

