IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON OPHTHALMOLOGY OUTPATIENT ATTENDANCE AND SURGICAL VOLUME: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY AT A TERTIARY-CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL IN UTTARAKHAND

Main Article Content

Dr. Chauhan Mitaben Vaibhavkumar
Dr. Pradip Mohanbhai Poriya

Keywords

COVID-19; ophthalmology outpatient; surgical volume; tele-ophthalmology; delayed presentation; Uttarakhand; health-service research.

Abstract

Background: The national COVID-19 lockdown imposed on 24 March 2020 fundamentally disrupted outpatient and surgical ophthalmic services across India. Tertiary-care institutions had to reconfigure workflow, triage, and follow-up within days. Region-specific data quantifying this disruption — and the emerging pattern of delayed presentation — remain limited for Uttarakhand, a hill state with a substantial rural catchment.


Objectives: To quantify the change in ophthalmology OPD attendance, elective and emergency surgical volume, and case-mix at SMIH / SGRRIMHS between January and June 2020 relative to the same period in 2019; and to identify patient-level factors associated with review non-attendance during the lockdown and early-unlock phases.


Methodology: A retrospective comparative analysis of hospital information system records for January–June 2020 was undertaken, with corresponding 2019 data as historical control. OPD attendance was tallied weekly; surgical volume monthly; case-mix and presenting-severity parameters by sub-speciality. A binary logistic regression model identified predictors of non-attendance among 1,842 scheduled reviews during April–June 2020. Analyses were performed in SPSS v22.0 with two-sided α = 0.05. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (SU/SGRR/IEC/2020/07-B).


Results: Total OPD attendance fell from 24,696 in 2019 to 15,317 in 2020 (–38.0%, p < 0.001), with a weekly trough of 68 visits (a 93% drop versus the corresponding 2019 week). Elective surgeries fell by 52.0% (1,483 → 712) and cataract surgeries by 61.8%, while emergency surgical volume declined only marginally (–12.5%, p = 0.184). Ocular-trauma and emergency presentations rose from 8.2% to 25.4% of the 2020 case-mix. Presenting LogMAR BCVA worsened from 0.42 to 0.68 and hypermature cataract at first visit rose from 21.5% to 38.6%. A new tele-ophthalmology service delivered 1,926 consultations. On multivariable analysis, residence outside Dehradun district (aOR 2.94), containment-zone residence (aOR 3.08) and age ≥ 60 years (aOR 2.41) were independent predictors of review non-attendance (all p < 0.001); model AUC 0.82.


Conclusion: The first pandemic wave caused a severe and asymmetric contraction of ophthalmology services: electives collapsed, emergencies persisted, and patients presented later and with more advanced disease. Tele-ophthalmology provided meaningful but partial mitigation. The findings support investment in hybrid tele-clinic pathways and region-specific outreach for hill districts in any future public-health emergency.


 

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Chan WM, Liu DTL, Chan PKS, Chong KKL, Yuen KSC, Chiu TYH, et al. Precautions in ophthalmic practice in a hospital with a major acute SARS outbreak: an experience from Hong Kong. Eye (Lond). 2006;20(3):283–9.
2. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1986–94.
3. Loon SC, Teoh SCB, Oon LLE, Se-Thoe SY, Ling AE, Leo YS, et al. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in tears. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(7):861–3.
4. Belser JA, Rota PA, Tumpey TM. Ocular tropism of respiratory viruses. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77(1):144–56.
5. Olofsson S, Kumlin U, Dimock K, Arnberg N. Avian influenza and sialic acid receptors: more than meets the eye? Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(3):184–8.
6. Chan EY, Cheng CK, Tam G, Huang Z, Lee P. Resilience and risk-reduction for rural communities in the People’s Republic of China facing health-disaster threats: lessons from SARS. Disasters. 2015;39(4):696–717.
7. Kruk ME, Myers M, Varpilah ST, Dahn BT. What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1910–2.
8. Madhav N, Oppenheim B, Gallivan M, Mulembakani P, Rubin E, Wolfe N. Pandemics: risks, impacts, and mitigation. In: Jamison DT, Gelband H, Horton S, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities: Improving Health and Reducing Poverty. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2017. Chapter 17.
9. Murthy GVS, Gupta SK, John N, Vashist P. Current status of cataract blindness and Vision 2020: the right to sight initiative in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56(6):489–94.
10. Vashist P, Senjam SS, Gupta V, Gupta N, Kumar A. Definition of blindness under National Programme for Control of Blindness: Do we need to revise it? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(2):92–6.
11. Khanna RC, Murthy GVS, Giridhar P, Krishnaiah S, Pant HB, Palamaner Subash Shantha G, et al. Cataract, visual impairment and long-term mortality in a rural cohort in India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78002.
12. Das T, Pappuru RR. Tele-ophthalmology: an Indian experience. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(12):1729–30.
13. Rathi S, Tsui E, Mehta N, Zahid S, Schuman JS. The current state of teleophthalmology in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):1729–34.
14. Caffery LJ, Taylor M, Gole G, Smith AC. Models of care in tele-ophthalmology: a scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(2):106–22.
15. Rao GN, Khanna R, Payal A. The global burden of cataract. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22(1):4–9.
16. Thylefors B, Chylack LT Jr, Konyama K, Sasaki K, Sperduto R, Taylor HR, et al. A simplified cataract grading system. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002;9(2):83–95.
17. Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1221–34.
18. Négrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5(3):143–69.
19. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mester V. The Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology system (BETT). J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004;27(2):206–10.
20. Agrawal R, Shah M, Mireskandari K, Yong GK. Controversies in ocular trauma classification and management: review. Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33(4):435–45.
21. Gopinathan U, Sharma S, Garg P, Rao GN. Review of epidemiological features, microbiological diagnosis and treatment outcome of microbial keratitis: experience of over a decade. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009;57(4):273–9.
22. Srinivasan M, Mascarenhas J, Rajaraman R, Ravindran M, Lalitha P, Glidden DV, et al. Corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis: the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT). Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(2):143–50.
23. Lin CC, Lalitha P, Srinivasan M, Prajna NV, McLeod SD, Acharya NR. Seasonal trends of microbial keratitis in South India. Cornea. 2012;31(10):1123–7.
24. Raman R, Rani PK, Reddi Rachepalle S, Gnanamoorthy P, Uthra S, Kumaramanickavel G, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in India: Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study report 2. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2):311–8.
25. Gadkari SS, Maskati QB, Nayak BK. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in India: the All India Ophthalmological Society diabetic retinopathy eye screening study 2014. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;64(1):38–44.
26. Keel S, Lee PY, Scheetz J, Li Z, Kotowicz MA, MacIsaac RJ, He M. Feasibility and patient acceptability of a novel artificial intelligence-based screening model for diabetic retinopathy at endocrinology outpatient services: a pilot study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4330.
27. Chan EW, Li X, Tham YC, Liao J, Wong TY, Aung T, Cheng CY. Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):78–85.
28. Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, Mandal P, John RK, McCarty CA, Rao GN. Open-angle glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(9):1702–9.
29. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(1):63–70.
End of manuscript —