EVALUATING THE EFFICACY OF VISCERAL ADIPOSITY INDEX (VAI) AS A PREDICTOR OF CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK FACTORS: A COMPARATIVE COMMUNITY-BASED STUDY AMONG INDUSTRIAL WORKERS IN WEST BENGAL AND GUJARAT

Main Article Content

Dr. Maushumi Barthakur
Dr. Maddali Venkata Lakshmi Prathyusha
Dr. Chaudhary Milan

Keywords

Visceral Adiposity Index, Cardiometabolic Risk, Industrial Workers, Durgapur, Ahmedabad, Metabolic Syndrome.

Abstract

Background: Industrial workers in India face a heightened risk of cardiometabolic diseases due to sedentary occupational stress and rapid lifestyle transitions. While Body Mass Index (BMI) is widely used, it often misses "metabolically obese" individuals. This study evaluates the efficacy of the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI)—a mathematical model integrating anthropometric and biochemical parameters—as a predictor of cardiometabolic risk factors among industrial cohorts in West Bengal and Gujarat.


Methods: A comparative community-based cross-sectional study was conducted involving 600 industrial workers (300 from Durgapur, West Bengal, and 300 from Ahmedabad, Gujarat). Physiological assessments included blood pressure, waist circumference, and BMI. Biochemical analysis for fasting blood glucose and lipid profiles (TG and HDL) was performed to calculate the VAI. Cardiometabolic risk was defined by the presence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, or impaired fasting glucose.


Results: The mean VAI was significantly higher in the Ahmedabad cohort ($4.1 \pm 1.2$) compared to the Durgapur cohort ($3.6 \pm 1.4, p < 0.05$). Across both regions, VAI showed a stronger positive correlation with systolic blood pressure ($r = 0.58$) and fasting glucose ($r = 0.62$) than BMI ($r = 0.34$). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that VAI had a superior Area Under the Curve (AUC = 0.86) for predicting metabolic syndrome compared to waist circumference alone (AUC = 0.72).


Conclusion: VAI is a more potent and gender-specific indicator of cardiometabolic risk than traditional anthropometric measures in Indian industrial workers. Incorporating VAI into routine occupational health screenings can facilitate earlier identification of high-risk individuals, allowing for targeted primary prevention in these vital economic hubs.


 


 

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Amato, M. C., et al. (2010). "Visceral Adiposity Index: a reliable indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic risk." Diabetes Care, 33(4), 920-922. (The original study defining the VAI formula).
2. Amato, M. C., & Giordano, C. (2014). "Visceral Adiposity Index: an indicator of adipose tissue dysfunction." European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 68(6), 634-640.
3. Després, J. P., & Lemieux, I. (2006). "Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome." Nature, 444(7121), 881-887. (Explains the physiological link between visceral fat and CVD).
4. Vaisman, N., et al. (2012). "Visceral adiposity index is a better predictor of liver fat content than Body Mass Index." Clinical Nutrition, 31(6), 901-905.
5. Estep, M., et al. (2011). "Visceral adipose tissue cytokine expression is associated with insulin resistance." Obesity, 19(11), 2118-2124.
6. Misra, A., & Khurana, L. (2009). "The metabolic syndrome in South Asians: epidemiology, determinants, and management." Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, 7(6), 497-514. (Crucial for the "Thin-Fat Indian" context).
7. Misra, A., et al. (2009). "Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians." Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 57, 163-170.
8. Gupta, R., et al. (2012). "Trends in prevalence of coronary heart disease and risk factors over 60 years in India." Indian Heart Journal, 64(3), 274-281.
9. Deepa, M., et al. (2007). "A high percentage of overweight in the urban population is associated with increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes." Indian Journal of Medical Research, 126(6), 522.
10. Joshi, S. R. (2003). "Metabolic syndrome—emerging clusters of the Indian phenotype." Journal of Association of Physicians of India, 51, 445-446.
11. Prabhakaran, D., et al. (2005). "Cardiovascular risk factors for coronary heart disease in two industrial populations in India." Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45(1), 67-73. (Directly relates to the multi-center industrial study design).
12. Reddy, K. S., et al. (2006). "Methods for establishing a surveillance system for cardiovascular diseases in Indian industrial populations." Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(6), 461-469.
13. Ahmad, J., et al. (2012). "Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an industrial population of North India." Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 16(6), 954-960.
14. Garg, S., et al. (2014). "Lifestyle-related risk factors for non-communicable diseases among industrial workers." Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 18(2), 55-59.
15. Satija, A., et al. (2014). "Occupational physical activity and cardiometabolic risk factors in an Indian population." Preventive Medicine, 67, 235-240.
16. Shah, N., et al. (2015). "Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and its components in an urban population of Gujarat, India." International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 2(4), 582-588.
17. Bhadra, M., et al. (2002). "Obesity and abdominal adiposity among adult Bengalee Hindus of Kolkata, India." Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 235-246.
18. Mandal, S., et al. (2014). "Assessment of metabolic syndrome among industrial workers of West Bengal." Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(11), CC11.
19. Patel, S., et al. (2020). "Lipid profile and its association with visceral adiposity in a semi-urban population of Gujarat." Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(2), 1024.
20. Das, M., et al. (2006). "The metabolic syndrome in an Indian urban population: Ahmedabad Study." Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 20(2), 95-102.