EXPLORING PAKISTANI GENERAL SURGEONS' KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE, PRACTICE, AND BARRIERS TOWARD SHOULDICE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.

Main Article Content

Mehmooda Wasim
Syed Muhammad Shafqatullah
Tooba Mahmud Gauhar
Shakeel Ahmed
Tehreem Ahmed
Fatima Imran

Keywords

Hernia, Inguinal surgery, Hernioplasty, Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pakistan.

Abstract

Introduction: The Shouldice repair is effective but declining due to limited training and support. This study aimed to evaluate Pakistani general surgeons’ knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers (KAPB) toward the Shouldice inguinal hernia repair technique. Methodology: A cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted from December 2024 to June 2025 across public and private hospitals in Karachi. General surgeons aged 30–65 years who routinely perform inguinal hernia repairs were included. A self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire, developed through literature review and expert consultation, assessed demographics, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers. Data were collected both online and in person. Associations between demographic characteristics and KAP outcomes were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, with effect sizes reported as Cramér’s V or Phi. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant Results: Of 420 surgeons approached, 384 were included. While 71.6% reported familiarity with the Shouldice technique, only 22.9% had formal training and 28.1% had ever performed the procedure. Confidence was low (14.3%), with mesh repair predominating (84.6%). The most reported barriers were lack of training (72.1%), limited residency exposure (65.9%), and institutional policies favoring mesh (51.0%). Surgeons older than 40 years, those with >10 years of experience, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed significantly higher knowledge, positive attitudes, and practice rates (all p<0.05).Conclusion: Pakistani surgeons recognize the Shouldice repair’s value but face systemic barriers to its practice. Targeted training, mentorship, and institutional support are essential to preserve this non-mesh option in contemporary hernia repair.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. Morrison Z, Kashyap S, Nirujogi VL. Adult inguinal hernia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
2. Bracale U, Melillo P, Piaggio D, et al. Is Shouldice the best non-mesh inguinal hernia repair technique? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Shouldice and Desarda. Int J Surg. 2019;62(1):12-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.001
3. Singh KJ, Mohanty SKV, Maudar KK. A comparative study of repair of inguinal hernias by Shouldice technique vis-à-vis Bassini’s technique. Med J Armed Forces India. 1999;55(4):322-324. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30360-X
4. Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, et al. Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(4):CD001543. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001543.pub4
5. Trevisonno M, Kaneva P, Watanabe Y, et al. A survey of general surgeons regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: practice patterns, barriers, and educational needs. Hernia. 2015;19(5):719-724. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-014-1287-8
6. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, et al. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg. 2002;89(1):45-49. DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01960.x
7. Niebuhr H, Pawlak M, Köckerling F. Differentiated application of recommended guideline techniques for treatment of inguinal hernia. Chirurg. 2017;88(3):276-280. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0379-2
8. Chan CK, Chan G. The Shouldice technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. J Minim Access Surg. 2006;2(3):124-128. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.27723
9. Kingsnorth AN, Gray MR, Nott DM. Prospective randomized trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1992;79(10):1068-1070. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800791026
10. Köckerling F, Simons MP. Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair. Visc Med. 2018;34(2):145-150. DOI: 10.1159/000487278
11. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1-165. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
12. Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, et al. Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management. BJS Open. 2023;7(5):zrad080. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080
13. Nanayakkara KDL, Viswanath NG, Wilson M, et al. An international survey of 1014 hernia surgeons: outcome of GLACIER (global practice of inguinal hernia repair) study. Hernia. 2023;27(5):1235-1243. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02818-8
14. Light D, Stephenson BM, Sanders DL. Management of the uncomplicated primary inguinal hernia in 2019: the practice amongst members of the British Hernia Society. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(3):191-193. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0152
15. Ndong A, Tendeng JN, Diallo AC, et al. Adult groin hernia surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2023;27(1):157-172. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02669-9
16. Ndong A, Diallo AC, Falola A, et al. Choice of surgical technique in groin hernia surgery among residents in Senegal: experience and influencing factors. J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025;4:14076. DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14076
17. Nazari T, Dankbaar MEW, Sanders DL, et al. Learning inguinal hernia repair? A survey of current practice and preferred methods of surgical residents. Hernia. 2020;24(5):995-1002. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02270-y
18. Vitous CA, Jafri SM, Seven C, et al. Exploration of surgeon motivations in management of abdominal wall hernias: a qualitative study. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2015916. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15916
19. Houston R, Hettige R, Sheena Y, et al. Mentorship in higher surgical training—what do trainees really want? Int J Surg. 2016;36(Suppl 1):S96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.331
20. Silver CM, Yuce TK, Clarke CN, et al. Disparities in mentorship and implications for US surgical resident education and wellness. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(6):687-695. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0533
21. Awuah WA, Tan JK, Bharadwaj HR, et al. Surgical mentorship in low-resource environments: opportunities and challenges, a perspective. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(8):e2258. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2258
22. Khalid MU, Mac A, Biderman M, Errett L, et al. Partnering to build surgical capacity in low-resource settings: a qualitative study of Canadian global surgeons. BMJ Open. 2023;13(3):e070148. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070148
23. Bhat S, Chia B, Babidge W, Maddern GJ. Assessing performance in ageing surgeons: systematic review. Br J Surg. 2023;110(11):1425-1427. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad158
24. Asserson DB, Janis JE. The aging surgeon: evidence and experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42(1):121-127. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab145
25. Waljee JF, Ohye RG. Surgeon experience and outcomes: an age old question. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(7):e003981. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003981
26. Jung Y, Kim K, Choi ST, et al. Association between surgeon age and postoperative complications/mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11251. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15275-7
27. Janjua MB, Inam H, Martins RS, et al. Gender discrimination against female surgeons: a cross-sectional study in a lower-middle-income country. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;57:157-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.033
28. Iqbal Y, Khan W, Mooghal M. Impediment to leadership opportunities for female doctors—gender disparity in Pakistani healthcare system. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:213-215. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S348255
29. Dawood MH, Roshan M, Daniyal M, et al. Gender inequity in clinical clerkships and its influence on career selection: a cross-sectional survey. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024;11:23821205241257401.
30. Kruse FM, Stadhouders NW, Adang EM, et al. Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;33(2):e434-e453. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2502
31. Barrenho E, Miraldo M, Propper C, Walsh B. The importance of surgeons and their peers in adoption and diffusion of innovation: an observational study of laparoscopic colectomy adoption and diffusion in England. Soc Sci Med. 2021;272:113715.