CROSS-SECTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF HAND HYGIENE PERFORMANCE AND HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTION RATES: A SINGLE-CENTRE STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Hand Hygiene; Cross-Sectional Studies; Hospital-Acquired Infection; Infection Control; Compliance.
Abstract
Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) remain a critical public health burden, contributing to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Hand hygiene (HH) is the cornerstone of infection prevention, yet compliance among healthcare workers (HCWs) is often suboptimal. Contemporary, concurrent assessments linking direct HH observation with real-time HAI rates are needed to validate this relationship in modern practice settings.
Objectives: This study aimed to: 1) Assess the overall and profession-specific HH compliance rates among HCWs in a tertiary hospital using direct observation, 2) Measure the point prevalence of key HAIs, and 3) Correlate unit-specific HH performance with corresponding HAI prevalence.
Methods: A hospital-wide cross-sectional assessment was carried out on a single day. Hand hygiene compliance was directly observed by trained staff following the WHO “My Five Moments for Hand Hygiene” approach. At the same time, the point prevalence of healthcare-associated infections was recorded, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and surgical site infections. Standard CDC/NHSN definitions were used for case identification. The collected data were summarized using descriptive statistics, and the association between variables was examined using Spearman’s rank correlation test.
Results: Overall HH compliance was 78.4% (1256/1602 observed moments). Compliance varied significantly by HCW profession: physicians 71.2%, nurses 82.1%, and ancillary staff 68.5%. The hospital-wide HAI point prevalence was 8.7% (89/1023 inpatients). A significant inverse correlation was found between ward-level HH compliance and HAI prevalence (r_s = -0.72, p=0.008).
Conclusion: Overall hand hygiene compliance was good; however, noticeable differences were seen between professional groups. Wards with better compliance tended to report fewer healthcare-associated infections, underscoring the importance of hand hygiene in routine patient care. There is a clear need for focused efforts to support and improve compliance among groups where performance remains suboptimal.
References
2. Haque M, Sartelli M, McKimm J, Abu Bakar M. Health care-associated infections - an overview. Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Nov 15;11:2321-33.
3. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme. Lancet. 2000 Oct 14;356(9238):1307-12.
4. Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uçkay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D. 'My five moments for hand hygiene': a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect. 2007 Sep;67(1):9-21.
5. Erasmus V, Daha TJ, Brug H, Richardus JH, Behrendt MD, Vos MC, et al. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;31(3):283-94.
6. Stiller A, Salm F, Bischoff P, Gastmeier P. Relationship between hospital ward design and healthcare-associated infection rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Jan 7;10(1):12.
7. Mathur P. Hand hygiene: back to the basics of infection control. Indian J Med Res. 2020 Feb;151(2):118-20.
8. Lee MH, Lee GA, Lee SH, Park YH. Effectiveness and core components of infection prevention and control programmes in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):92-95.
9. Price L, MacDonald J, Melone L, Howe T, Flowers P, Cleary K, et al. Effectiveness of national and subnational infection prevention and control interventions in high-income and upper-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 May;18(5):e159-e171.
10. Azim S, Juergens C, McLaws ML. An average hand hygiene day for nurses and physicians: the burden is not equal. Am J Infect Control. 2020 May;48(5):507-511.
11. Saito H, Inoue K, Ditai J, Wanume B, Abeso J, Balyejussa J, et al. Alcohol-based hand rub and incidence of healthcare-associated infections in a rural hospital in Uganda. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Jan 20;10(1):17.
12. Suetens C, Latour K, Kärki T, Ricchizzi E, Kinross P, Moro ML, et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections, estimated incidence and composite antimicrobial resistance index in acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities: results from two European point prevalence surveys, 2016 to 2017. Euro Surveill. 2018 Nov;23(46).
13. Weiner-Lastinger LM, Abner S, Edwards JR, Kallen AJ, Karlsson M, Magill SS, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with adult healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015-2017. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;41(1):1-18.
14. Ista E, van der Hoven B, Kornelisse RF, van der Starre C, Vos MC, Boersma E, et al. Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):724-34.
15. Zellmer C, Blakney R, Van Hoof S, Safdar N. Impact of sink location on hand hygiene compliance for Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Infect Control. 2019 May;47(5):583-584.
16. Mitchell BG, Shaban RZ, MacBeth D, Wood CJ, Russo PL. The burden of healthcare-associated infection in Australian hospitals: A systematic review of the literature. Infect Dis Health. 2017 Sep;22(3):117-128.
17. Ward DJ. The Hawthorne effect on hand hygiene compliance: A note of caution. Am J Infect Control. 2020 Oct;48(10):1130-1132.

